Steve Austin,
this Steve Austin, is one of the thirty. If you have visited the Grand Canion and are able to read his non peer reviewed writings and videos without seriously injuring your self laughing, you are too far gone to critically read hypothesis. Seriously, take his idea about the rate and manner of fossil deposition. "“And that is what happened to the nautiloid shells. They were deposited quickly, frozen in time. One in every seven is standing vertical in the bed. The others tend to point the same way indicating the direction of the slurry flow. It’s a very interesting arrangement of fossils.” The "tip" of the nautiloid shell is rather the heaviest part of the shell and settles most rapidly when the creature died while above the bed of the ocean. So it's to be expected that a portion of the shells would look like javelins stuck in the mud of the sea bed. I've known hundreds of geologist, geophysicists, geological and mining engineers over the years and not one thought there was any merit in young earth creationism. The age and deposition of rocks is part and parcel of their trade. If these fundamental theories and laws are untrue, how come the work so well and accurately?