Goldberg wrote the article which concerns this thread. NRO is not totally irrelevant. But I respect your opinion.
Goldberg’s WORDS are relevant....Goldberg personally is not. If his words are true and valid....and some of them are....then WTF does it matter that some of his words in the past are not true or valid. What does it matter if his publication is sliding to the dark side (and I admit they are)?
This idea that because NRO or Ann Coulter or others have strayed some in the recent past equating to nothing they say being valid is just EFFEN DAMNED STOOOOOOPID.