Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I was hoping he would comment on this, good for him.


2 posted on 06/26/2015 2:28:57 PM PDT by erod (Chicago Conservative | Cruz or Lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: erod

Only one with guts to state this . Bush Paul etc all will say it has been dealt with and we have to move on and we have to respect the decision.

Actually for Paul he could not careless about any social issues.


58 posted on 06/26/2015 4:56:30 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: erod

Hooray for Ted. He is exactly right.

As much as I despise the idea of perverting the meaning of “marriage”, the more serious problem is the subverting of the Constitution.

Words no longer have any meaning, because SCOTUS can twist them to mean whatever they choose them to mean.


74 posted on 06/26/2015 7:06:27 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson