Posted on 06/19/2015 10:33:23 AM PDT by Voice of Reason1
Once again we have witnessed the divider in chief using a ‘serious crisis’ to pit people against each other instead of trying to bring them together.
‘President’ Obama could have reacted to the recent events by not slyly mentioning how he plans on using it once again to incrementally destroying liberty.
Rather than uniting the country and healing it’s wounds, we had the ‘President’ using mass murder as just another opportunity to score political points for his socialist national agenda.
This why ‘President’ Obama will be considered THE WORST, bar none.
Compare this ‘President’ to those of the past who dealt with far worse tragedies during their terms in office and how they united the nation rather than using them against their political enemies.
Compare and contrast him to the Greatest Republican presidents who dealt with civil war, terrorist attacks with magnanimity in first binding up the nation’s wounds with inspiring words and deeds.
These were great leaders that didn’t take advantage of the situation as our current ‘President’ has done time and time again.
I won’t here because it pains me to even mention them in connection to the current ‘President’.
Make no mistake, I am not absolving ‘President’ Obama of all of his scandals and illegal actions, they are legion in the extreme. But they pale in comparison to his use of events for crass political gain instead of uniting the country.
We cannot fathom how his use of such tragedies will play out on the pages of history, but we know the results of what has happened when past Presidents have resisted the urge to do this.
His use of those events to divide the country against itself and the results of such division will be the reason he will be designated by our posterity as the Worst, make my words.
?????
Totally agree.
I believe the point is that Obama could have united the country.
But instead he saw it as yet one more opportunity to further his war against freedom.
Not if, as seems likely, there will only be socialists to write the history books.
They won’t be able to ‘whitewash’ this....
Depends on who you are asking...
I still read libtards websites that think Jimmy Carter was a great president, not good, but great...
40 years from today libtards will still blame Bush for all of Obama failures...
BDS is a along term psychological disorder...there is no cure, just varying degrees of it...
The Soviet Union whitewashed everything. We are not so far from that. Read about “microaggressions” in the Universities. These laughable Academic trends become California then National fairly quickly and we don’t really notice the progress but how many words do you not use or use defiantly now that would have been normal a few years ago?
They are not "failures". They are deliberate acts of sabotage. Failure implies he had good intentions. His stated goal is the "fundamental transformation of the United States". Surely we don't want him to succeed in that?
No he won’t, because Libs write the history books.
My post was what libtards would say 40 years from now, not what I think...
They are deliberate acts of sabotage.
I would have to agree...
The signs of a future disaster were clearly obvious in 2008, but nobody paid attention. After he leaves office in 2017, more details will come out to make people feel ashamed that they ever voted for him.
He hasn’t done a damn thing for America except drive it into communism with him as King. Destroyed everything he touched.
Yes, I was hoping he would unite but we got the devil and he don’t play fair!
But the point is that it’s Obama’s divisiveness that will have long term implications.
Think about how history would have been different if the South had been treated differently directly after the war.
You’re assuming there will be a history to write.
There was an agenda and the agenda is being worked and quite effective.
The Titanic has already struck the iceberg. There’s not much point in rearranging the deck chairs now.
So what should he have said?
Take a look at the History channel’s 2 part series ‘Third Reich’ especially the first part ‘The Rise’
It goes thought the the Rise of Hitler and his socialist party - and how everyone at least on the outside supported him.
The later on in ‘The fall’ no one seemed to support him..
Third Reich - ‘’The Rise’’https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ppk_6Q5DTTM
Something Other than trying to push his anti-Liberty agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.