“It seems that the article has a very clear and understandable explanation of how the site was dated. Now, unless, of course you reject physics, geology and biology, the article makes a great deal of sense.”
JimSEA, you have been on FR for while... Surely you know that there is a group here that is willfully ignorant, disbelieving, and downright hostile to common physics, geology and biology, if they perceive it conflicts with their interpretation of the Bible; and they will pounce with gusto on any of these sorts of articles. You are wasting your time trying to discuss things rationally with them.
Don’t even bother.
On rare occasion, someone will read the evidence for one or another scientific discovery or explanation, if only to refute it. It’s not so easy to do if you understand the observations, evidence and methodology. Absurd misrepresentations should not be supported by people who know better keeping quiet. They are welcome to their beliefs but not their “facts”.
Some people will become more receptive to objective reasoning and will find they don’t need to abandon their faith. Genesis is remarkable as allegory.