Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mojito

Does Judicial Watch have to be excerpted?

From the article:

“The FBI liaison officers regularly assigned to Mexico were not present at the meeting and conspicuously absent were representatives from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It’s not clear why DHS did not participate.”

I would suggest that the regular liaison officers and DHS were not present because they are not blindly loyal to the O regime or haven’t been bought/threatened yet. As much as we like to poke (pun intended) fun at the DHS/TSA maroons at the airport, there are many BP agents (DHS) who genuinely are patriotic Americans who would never go along with the regime’s shenanigans against our nation.

Also from the article:

“After JW published its latest ISIS in Mexico story a few weeks ago, JW President Tom Fitton turned to social media to ask why the Obama administration won’t fight ISIS on our border. A character identified as “Mujahid145” responded: “Islamic state is remaining and expanding.” The evidence certainly seems to support that assessment. In fact, this week, in the aftermath of the Dallas shooting, ISIS warned of “future attacks” that will be “harsher and worse.””

Perhaps the regime has plans for ISIS to be used in conjunction with what appears to be building into a summer of planned social unrest in cities across the nation.


5 posted on 05/06/2015 9:17:41 AM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carthego delenda est

To regimes like the obarry administration, false flags manipulating real enemies to do violence are tools of the oligarchy.


9 posted on 06/13/2015 1:20:35 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson