CRAZY CHARLES JOSEPH SCARBOROUGH ALERT!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Boomers that never grew up are now running the asylum.
2 posted on
03/29/2015 6:59:37 PM PDT by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
because the stupid bastard (literally accurate) in charge of US foreign policy thought the world would swoon at his feet because he’s just so incredibly awesome.
in other words, he’s a dangerous, self obsessed newbie with nearly terminal naïveté.
3 posted on
03/29/2015 7:01:20 PM PDT by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s a puzzle. Like a dead young female staffer in a Congressman’s office.
4 posted on
03/29/2015 7:01:24 PM PDT by
hlmencken3
(I paid for an argument, but you're just contradicting!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This would be directly Joe’s fault.
5 posted on
03/29/2015 7:01:53 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hillary was Secretary of State for four years and left the Middle East literally in flames.
That’s what happened.
7 posted on
03/29/2015 7:09:50 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This former rhino turned RAT is a disgrace. He has learned how to maintain his audience, just throw enough crap against the proverbial liberal wall, see what sticks and go with it. Here is the answer most stupid one: the feckless fool on the hill.
8 posted on
03/29/2015 7:12:43 PM PDT by
Fungi
(Evolution: no science, no truth, no nothing. Full of faith, faith in the "god" of chance.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Oh. So it’s all Bush’s fault and Obama inherited the mess.
Sure.
10 posted on
03/29/2015 7:17:52 PM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Bush had things pretty well in hand, a situation Obama was anxious to undo and Obama was successful in reversing every gain Bush had made. We are now in the middle of an Obama world and just wait until Iran emerges victorious.
12 posted on
03/29/2015 7:27:03 PM PDT by
JimSEA
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Liberal historians will trace much of the regions turmoil to JIMMY "Peanut Brain" CARTER.
13 posted on
03/29/2015 7:27:45 PM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Everything is Bush's fault, and the success of the surge is credited to Petraeus, not Bush. No wonder that Scarborough is comfortable on MSNBC.
Bush in 2003 was faced with choosing the lesser of two evils. If he had done nothing, Saddam would still be in power and perhaps would have nukes. The rants like Scarborough's that attack Bush for his decision never ask what would have happened if Bush had done nothing.
It was my feeling at the time that if Bush let Saddam stay in power, Bush would be defeated in 2004. Of course there is no way to prove or disprove that. Kerry in 2005 could have started the Clinton-Obama demolition of American interests in the Middle East 4 years earlier.
Bill Clinton didn't exactly have much success in the Middle East either and his forgotten errors (like refusing to accept Osama bin Laden when offered him) caused a lot of our later difficulties.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Stumbling through history: How did U.S. foreign policy end up in such disarray? This must be a trick question. You have an elected President who hates the United States like the Devil hates Holy Water or Allah hates infidels.
15 posted on
03/29/2015 7:31:31 PM PDT by
stevem
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Gee Joe, I think it might be the person YOU VOTED FOR ..!!
16 posted on
03/29/2015 7:33:29 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
("The hour has arrived to gather the Harvest")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I will agree with Joe that taking out Saddam now appears to have been a mistake. Everything else is Zero’s fault of mismanagement.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Bush over time was methodically surrounding the center of world terrorism in Iran. Øbama is fundamentally transforming that situation, enlarging the power of Iran so it surrounds those that remain instead. Just turning the tables a tad.
18 posted on
03/29/2015 7:35:54 PM PDT by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Future historians will look back and wonder why the U.S. transferred enormous amounts of their wealth to Muslim countries to pay for oil when the U.S. could have and should have simply taken it.
19 posted on
03/29/2015 7:37:49 PM PDT by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is pretty simple.
Weakness encourages aggression. And this President is the biggest wimp to have ever inhabited the Oval Office.
Even squinty-eyed terrorists with pea-brains can spot weakness that apparent.
20 posted on
03/29/2015 7:38:48 PM PDT by
rlmorel
("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
By the evil designs of dear leader.
This is intentional.
See tagline
22 posted on
03/29/2015 7:46:44 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
23 posted on
03/29/2015 7:50:14 PM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because he loves communism and because he hates our allies like UK, Germany, Israel, Canada, etc., and especically because he wants to build up the global IslamoNazi caliphate (dictatorship) at our expense and the expense of everybody else in his way.
Question answered, see above.
24 posted on
03/29/2015 7:51:37 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
(Foolish people ... have eyes and see not)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
By retreating too quickly from Iraq, ignoring mass murder in Syria, abandoning Iranian reformers being shot in Tehrans streets, blowing up Libya and then leaving it to burn, ignoring ISIL until it the terror group metastasized across the Middle East, antagonizing the Sunni world by launching a desperate bid for an Iranian nuclear deal, and stiff-arming Americas two most important regional allies in Jerusalem and Cairo, Barack Obama has somehow inherited a dangerously unfocused U.S. foreign policy and reduced it to rubble.
Seems like a fair assessment. Or as I say, George W. Bush may have been a moron, but the Obamanation makes him look like Stephen Hawking.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson