You never heard of Nat Hentoff, Jazz Critic, Village Voice Columist, Civil-Rights Advocate, Pro-Lifer, ATHEIST?
What does that have to do with it? First Amendment?
My point was government sticks its nose in a multitude of places where it does not belong. Why then should the RTL’s case be limited because “it’s unseemly” or “doesn’t help our case”? There are plenty of cases where government forces the citizen to be subject to instruction - why not here?
That excuse to which I replied is just a tired old goody-two shoes veiled acceptance of the left’s practices while clinging to Roberts Rules of Order in the midst of an all out ideological war.