.
"Rogue" is too soft a word if any of this is true; "treasonous" might be better.
Posted on 03/19/2015 12:35:47 PM PDT by CedarDave
We all know that the only reason you would deliberately and premeditatedly set up a private email address and server is to have total control over your communications — to keep people away from those communications and to retain the ability to edit and delete your content.
In Hillary Clinton’s case, given her long history of concealment and duplicity, total control was the system’s purpose, not to keep track of Chelsea’s bridal gift registry.
A story originally reported in 2013 (and little-noticed at the time) may offer a deeper dimension to the reasons she wanted this control — and it leaves us with many new, unanswered questions.
First, a step back: In order to understand this Hillary scandal, you must understand her pattern in past scandals. And you must understand the man at the center of so many of them: Sidney Blumenthal.
Mr. Blumenthal is the Clintons’ longtime and fiercely loyal political hit man. He orchestrated many of the sleaziest attacks on Clinton opponents, including smearing Monica Lewinsky as a “stalker” at Mrs. Clinton’s request. His mastery of the dark arts was so notorious that it may have been the reason Mr. Obama pointedly denied Mrs. Clinton’s request to appoint him to a special, official role in her State Department.
But Mrs. Clinton has never been one to take “no” for an answer. It now appears that despite Mr. Obama’s order, Mr. Blumenthal may have still served Mrs. Clinton’s political and policy needs, but in a shadowy, non-official capacity.
Guccifer released a screenshot of what it claimed is Mrs. Clinton’s private email inbox, chock-full of emails from Mr. Blumenthal to her hdr22@clintonemail.com address. The website Gawker then published the screenshot, complete with subject lines and dates of the Blumenthal emails.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
"Rogue" is too soft a word if any of this is true; "treasonous" might be better.
BTW, later in the story it says Gawker reported the breach to the State Department and the Russian Times then published four lengthy emails from Mr. Blumenthal to Mrs. Clinton (content obviously unverified).
HRC has a lot of experience doing this.
She has a long track record of going after and trying to silence women involved with her “husband”.
If she had nothing to hide, why was she hiding it?
I never got over her “we came, we saw, he died (cackle cackle)” comment over Col. Quadaffi - who had been fairly obedient in recent years. Now look at Libya.
This woman feels entitled to mess with everyone and everything - she is a power hungry madwoman. She reminds me of the bad terminator.
I suspect all who support her of just focusing on feathering their own nests - the country and the world be damned.
In fact her pathological need for secrecy is the best explanation for the unnecessary deaths of four Americans in Benghazi. IMO
Not Intel Intel. Crime intel
Hillary’s foreign policy was being bankrolled by the Muslim Brotherhood via the Clinton Foundation. How odd that she would back Mohammed Morsi who is now in prison in Egypt on terrorism charges? How come no one in the media asks her about her treasonous support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt?
.
"Rogue" is too soft a word if any of this is true; "treasonous" might be better.
Follow the money, as was said in Watergate days. If the appearance of corruption matters, there’s a lot of explaining to be done about the Clinton Foundation’s doings with international donors.
Someone with some real Internet and computer savvy needs to point out to Trey Gowdy, Fox News and the MSM that there are more ways than just email to move data between computers.
Did Hillary and her team including Sidney B utilize a Hillery Cloud Server? Did they send documents back and forth using FTP?
Where are the hackers when we really need them?
Just now posted on Drudge with link to this story:
Exclusive: Despite Hillary Clinton promise, charity did not disclose donors (Reuters story)
But in a breach of the pledge, the charity's flagship health program, which spends more than all of the other foundation initiatives put together, stopped making the annual disclosure in 2010, Reuters has found.
Now we’re starting to get down to it.
Record-keeping is small beans compared to the espionage.
Hillary unleashed ALL of America’s secrets to the world.
For free.
ALL of them.
Hey, she warned everyone in 2008 - elect her President or there will be hell to pay.
But America didn’t obey her.
So America chose is own punishment.
Hillary WILL be obeyed, or you WILL be punished.
It’s called “50 Shades of Treason.”
The clintoons never do fulfill those type of promises. Don't hold your breath waiting for her to respond!
Yes.
I knew a guy that thought the world of Quadaffi.
Quadaffi’s mercenaries got him and some others out of Iran when the hostages were taken. They were locked in one of the parts trailer at a rig when they were rescued.
The mercenaries executed all the Iranians except one, they let him take the message back.
They ended up staying in one of Quadaffi’s palaces for 2-3 weeks.
How does the information posted on Csdar Dave s link apply to the information you have. Connect some dots for me. It’s all a muddle
Not disclosing donors to a tax-exempt "charity" reeks of money laundering, tax evasion, govt fraud. electronic fraud, bank fraud....and so on.
The MO might include:
<><> Using joint bank accounts to facilitate the transfer funds from one account to another, and/or wire-transfer tax-exempt monies offshore;
<><> To cover their tracks, fake invoices might be created to show that money deposited into accounts was being used for legit purposes.
<><> Financial schemes scheme might be advanced by issuing phony statements of payments from financial sources that actually cover the transfer of funds for insiders' personal use....... and/or for offshore money laundering schemes.
And to facilitate all of this, email traffic may have been generated. Supposedly 30,000 plus emails were deleted and/or not provided to the State Dept. as they were unrelated to State Dept. business (so Hillary says). Do you really think they were all about Chelsea’s wedding?? Something else was afoot and now they are trying to cover their tracks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.