“Missouri had argued that medical experts found Clayton understood why he was being executed and that meant he was competent to face the needle.”
He was competent. He knew what he did and that it was wrong. What’s the problem here?
Talisker, with one statement through COMMON SENSE right out the window.
Pay no attention to buffons, they just like to babble.
The problem is believing that when a person with a hole in his brain says he knows what he did was wrong, it means the same thing as it does when a person without a hole in his brain says it. Or that a person with a hole in his brain had the control over his actions he would have if he didn't have a hole in his brain.