I’ve tried to find out how many tests he was actually given, but there are only two mentioned. It could be sloppy journalism that doesn’t want to ask the question though. It’s bad enough that he had one false negative. It would be worse to find out that he had more than that. If the WHO protocol was followed, that could mean there was another false negative, which simply isn’t being reported. That wouldn’t surprise me. All I’ve been able to find out is that his first negative test was done on Nov. 6, and that the positive was done on Nov. 10. This despite his having many symptoms.
This article says that 9 people have been treated for ebola in the U.S. - I count 6 - 2 nurses in TX, Mr. Duncan, the doctor in NY and the original doctor and aid worker. This one makes 7 - who are the other 2?
This whole thing makes no sense.
yeah I am almost positive now that the protocol is two days after a Negative result while suspicion and symptoms are present.
Either way raises a very dark specter.