Posted on 11/13/2014 8:15:01 AM PST by beaversmom
>> Thus lots of peaceful sounding and noble things that appear early in the book are canceled out by other things he says later on.
Later on he had syphilis
“Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.” (Koran 8:39)
The Koran also allows infidels to be put to death for simply not being Muslim.
These apologists are purposely misrepresenting the doctrine of Islam. It is completely permissible to lie about what Islam is to Westerners. It’s called taqiyya. The Koran has a lot of contradictory statements in it. Muslim scholars take the chronologically latest one. Since Islam started out having to pretend to be a normal realistic tolerant religion when it first started out, there are a lot of normal tolerant sounding things in the early parts of the Koran, but they have bee superseded by the later “kill everyone who refuses to convert” statements.
It’s the same way with Muslim populations in traditionally non-Muslim countries. They pretend to be normal rational and tolerant until they figure there are enough of them that they need to be in charge. Then the tolerance stops.
No one in the middle East believes what this person is saying is true and neither should you.
Correct, it is call “Abrogation”. You can’t cherry pick quotes from the Quran, you have to know the *order* - which is made more difficult by the fact that the book isn’t in chronological order.
Therefore, pointing these out is pointless. Mo got more and more violent as time went on, murder was common and specifically calls for “smite the necks of the unbelievers” (Christians and Jews) - I’m sure all these quotes probably apply still to Muslims, so long as they’re the “right kind of Muslim” !!!
The Koran, piss be upon it, stipulates that all things are Allah’s (their moon god), and if anyone denies this then they must be killed. However, they can be killed in time and not right away, but they must still be killed if they will not convert.
“We dont yet know who carried out the attack, but we know they either arent Muslims at all or they arent real Muslims, in the nature of the case.”
This is called the “no true scotsman” fallacy. When you start off your article with such illogical nonsense, there is not much hope that the rest of the arguments will be any better.
Besides, we only need to quote one section from the Quran to debunk these claims (parenthetical notes are mine):
“[This is a declaration of] disassociation, from Allah and His Messenger, to those with whom you had made a treaty among the polytheists. (Christians are considered polytheists by Muslims)
So travel freely, [O disbelievers], throughout the land [during] four months (the four holy months of Islam) but know that you cannot cause failure to Allah and that Allah will disgrace the disbelievers.
And [it is] an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah is disassociated from the disbelievers, and [so is] His Messenger. So if you repent, that is best for you; but if you turn away - then know that you will not cause failure to Allah . And give tidings to those who disbelieve of a painful punishment.
Excepted are those with whom you made a treaty among the polytheists and then they have not been deficient toward you in anything or supported anyone against you; so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended]. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous [who fear Him].
And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah (signifying conversion to Islam), let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.” From Al-Tawbah 9 - http://quran.com/9
Notice, at the end, there is no choice given to “live peacefully with the polytheists (Christians)”. They are to be killed, unless they convert to Islam, and this is commanded by the Muslims’ holy book.
Much better!
Actually, in the supreme irony, the origins of Mo’s Allah is a goddess, a Hindi goddess! So all these women-hating mooselimbs are dedicated to a transvestite-god/goddess!
Yes, I believe you have translated the doublespeak correctly.
Just like the Communists defined “Peace” as the elimination of all opposition to Communism.
You are way off. There are many more Koran and Hadith references glorifying Jihad and terrorism against the un-believers. Islam is chock full of contradictory material
exactly!!! No Koranic apologist is going to make any headway against you.
You are fully immunized by the truth! About Islam.
Yes, definitely have heard that regarding the Koran, but I’m not a scholar of it so I couldn’t site any verse touchy feely or violent. Just playing devil’s advocate and taking this person at his word about the good things. But if the adherents are ignoring the good stuff and the Koran is chock full of the violent and that’s what they are following, it’s all moot anyway.
Islam resolves the contradictions by stating that in any contradiction, the later passage supersedes the earlier passage.
The problem is of course, the earlier passages were the "peaceful" Islam and the later passages were all head hacking, clit hacking, hand/foot hacking, gay hanging, kill all the Jews, passages.
The more peaceful Mecca verses of the koran are pretty much superseded by the more aggressive Medinian verses of the Koran.
No problemo.... we are here to help you understand it in 10 seconds flat! :) Freepers are faster than wikipedia!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.