So you think the enumerated powers explicitly allow for smoking pot,
I think we both know "smoking pot" is not explicitly mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. If you don't then it's time you read it.
or you think they dont allow states to make pot smoking illegal?
Likewise, there's no enumerated power to dictate whether the states must either criminalize it or legalize it.
So there you have it - two choices, both based on an invalid premise, and either one I choose is going to be wrong.
And you can stop with the feigned incomprehension. If you hand me a loaded question I'm going to do my best to unload it, take it apart and hand it back to you in pieces without pulling the trigger. If you don't want that done with them, don't hand them to me.
What is your position on pot and the constitution then, or is that unfair?