Here’s how it works.
Kansas is a red state. Pat Roberts is an incumbent with a history of winning in Kansas. Kansas has a history of not sending Democrats to Washington.
Michigan is a forever tease. A swing state with a strong blue tint. Land is a rookie. Michigan has a history of not sending Republicans to the US Senate
Look at the all the models.
Michigan is basically a 99% sure bet for D hold. At 538, WaPo, NYT.
Kansas is a toss up. With same models. Because of the political demographics and history.
Money is better spent in Kansas.
The optics suck.
What a load.
The same political wizards told us to give up on RTW because it had about a .0009% chance of success.
Money is better spent in Kansas
++++
Obviously true. Nice analysis.
Thank you for improving the signal to noise ratio on this thread.
Playing defense always a sure way to advance the “conservative” agenda. The GOPE can’t see past their preening images in the mirror. They are becoming the Cubs of politics.