Go on with the insulting condescension. Being a jackhole makes you so much more convincing.
Once again, I was specifically referring to the Republican Party when they had control of every branch of the Federal Government. This is important because the party had no limitations to accomplishing what they always say they want to do. They demonstrated that all their campaign rhetoric was empty and untrustworthy.
I don’t know what comparison you think I was making. I was just bringing up their sorry-ass track record. And there’s been no reason to believe they’ll do any better this time.
The point you were making can be filed under “N” for NO DUH or maybe “S” for shallow.
It was still a terrible analogy, because control of Congress when you have the Oval Office is totally different than when you don’t. When your party controls the office, THE PREZ sets the agenda for congress de facto. When you are the opposition, it’s a totally different. That’s why 94 is more apt analogy. Period.
And whining about my attitude is another sign of the weakness of your position.