Posted on 07/23/2014 6:52:23 AM PDT by YourAdHere
Edited on 07/23/2014 7:24:54 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at afro.com ...
The wording of the law is not ambiguous.
There is nothing confusing about the wording unless you are a liberal looking to make sure that Obamacare goes forward regardless of what the law says. This 4th Circuit Court judge is one of those.
And that FED subsidized coverage is paid for with what? Those monies have to be in the budget.
Just print it. The currency is really worthless anyway.
Worth the read. Looks like they expected ALL states to set up their own exchange.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.