Apollo Astronaut: Climate Alarmism Is the ‘Biggest Fraud in the Field of Science’

CNS ^ | July 2, 2014 | Craig Bannister

[rockinqsranch]

Our government is run by professional political class of self promoting, self serving con artists making laws to legally steal our money, and promote at our expense more avenues, and opportunities for themseves to legally steal even more.

Our traditionally respected institutions likewise are run by similar types of opportunists who support they of the professional political class with their hands out for much of the stolen taxpayer treasure.

A cycle that needs to be addressed.

[familyop]

"One thing that amuses me are the numbers on cost of their centralized “solar power stations”. They can buy a complete, independent solar panel unit with 20+ kw service for each home more cheaply than they can centralize it and send it out on wires to each of those homes."

"So, it really isn’t about ‘clean’ energy. It’s about centralization and awarding a new class of energy cronies with the money from monthly energy bills."

Yes! And there's no need for subsidies, rebates or tax credits. In my part of the West, about 1.5 kilowatts of charging is more than enough for a house without an electric clothes dryer, dishwasher, range or forced air heating. With a little practice, old-style percolator coffee pots even work fine.

For well water pumps, cisterns either with generators or solar power plants with slow pumps are fine. For those who use the National Electrical Code as a reference, have knowledge of PV solar systems and experience in electrical work safety, a self-install makes using the technology actually worthwhile now.

[familyop]

"The rocket stoves are the masonry type built right into corners of a house?"

rocket stove mass heater
http://www.richsoil.com/rocket-stove-mass-heater.jsp

[adorno]

The left is full of frauds.

Global warming, and Obama: the 2 biggest frauds on the planet.

[UCANSEE2]

Like ‘new’ math, we have a ‘new’ scientific method.

Here is how it works.

Pick you conclusion. Then go back and try to find facts which support your conclusion.

If you do, then only use those facts or figures.

If you can’t find any, then make them up.

[nascarnation]

If you can’t find any, then make them up.

And if your theories lead to action that further adds control to the elites, they will be happy to fund your work.

[UCANSEE2]

What is the sacrifice in their earth religion?

Your basic rights.

[Ezekiel]

That’s it in three words.

[SunkenCiv]

> The media are largely to blame for public misconceptions - not because they’re intentionally misleading the public, but because they “just don’t want to go into the time and trouble to find out.” “If they do go into it and look at it for themselves, they become a lot more neutral in their presentation,” he says. Worst of all, Cunningham says, media are promoting the “nonsensical” claim that there’s scientific consensus accepting the hypothesis of man-made climate...

He’s almost right — the media push leftist agitprop, and know they are doing that.

[Cboldt]

"And, the amazing thing to people like me... is that there are people that believe the nonsense they're being fed."

That applies across the board, not just to the climate liars.

[GOPJ]

The media are largely to blame for public misconceptions - not because they're intentionally misleading the public, but because they "just don't want to go into the time and trouble to find out." "If they do go into it and look at it for themselves, they become a lot more neutral in their presentation," he says.

Most reporters can't do math ... or think in those logical types of terms. It's way they can be fooled them 'consensus' talk - and appeals to authority. If reporters 'looked into it', it wouldn't help much.

[GOPJ]

The media are largely to blame for public misconceptions - not because they're intentionally misleading the public, but because they "just don't want to go into the time and trouble to find out." "If they do go into it and look at it for themselves, they become a lot more neutral in their presentation," he says.

Most reporters can't do math ... or think in those types of logical terms. It's why they can be fooled with talk of 'consensus' - and appeals to authority. If reporters looked into it, it wouldn't help.

[publius911]

"In the media, it was being called a theory. Obviously, they didn't know what it means to be a theory."

In all fairness, the fraudsters call it a "theory" and most of the MSM is too ignorant, or too stupid to understand what qualifies as a theory. Or even as science!

[GOPJ]

Thanks for the ping.