Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 06/30/2014 4:29:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:

childish behavior



Skip to comments.

Supreme Court: Closely held companies can’t be required to cover contraceptives
Catholic Review ^ | 6/30/14 | Patricia Zapor

Posted on 06/30/2014 3:21:29 PM PDT by Welchie25

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Welchie25

Lets ALL go to the Lobby! Tuesday, we’ll be there using our credit cards{leaving a “footprint”}!


21 posted on 06/30/2014 4:09:26 PM PDT by PizzaDriver ( on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

bfl


22 posted on 06/30/2014 4:10:04 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; Fuzz

I could be wrong but I would think that “publicly traded” is not “closely held.”


23 posted on 06/30/2014 4:12:50 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Welchie25

All forms of chemical “birth control” are really abortion drugs. They “control birth” by making sure the “fertilized egg”(what you and I would call a baby), is not born.

Contraceptives — those things that prevent conception — are barrier methods (like condoms) and good old-fashioned abstinence. The latter has been made practically illegal in LiberalLand.

Honestly, I think we should throw out 100% of the birth control/contraceptive culture and get back to God. Who’s with me on this?


24 posted on 06/30/2014 4:21:02 PM PDT by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack

And if publicly traded it probably couldn’t be subject to a rule like this either. Because then just who has the standard that deserves the deference? There could be a mechanism for getting standards worked in, such as shareholder resolutions.

The USSC probably did the best they could here. Some other case would have to come up involving shareholders before the principle could be supported by the Court.


25 posted on 06/30/2014 4:21:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

Let’s not have science as lousy as the global warmists do — anti ovulation drugs aren’t abortifacients any more then refraining from sex is murder.

What a conscientious Christian ought to do is beyond the scope I am treating here.


26 posted on 06/30/2014 4:23:31 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Right. Now all we have to do is sponsor shareholder resolutions at public companies asserting each company’s dedication to Christian values and their abhorrence at paying for abortion drugs.

Such resolutions would be very easy to pass and would generate a slew of new test cases.


27 posted on 06/30/2014 4:27:00 PM PDT by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

God makes everything beautiful “in its time.”


28 posted on 06/30/2014 4:29:15 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

That’s the story. But if you think all “birth control” pills do is prevent ovulation, then you are buying the liberal media spin. They want to pretend “birth control” is the same as contraception. But there is a reason why they are not called contraception pills.


29 posted on 06/30/2014 4:29:42 PM PDT by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson