Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Hydrazine

So why did they keep the king instead of ousting him?


20 posted on 06/22/2014 5:45:22 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Because they needed a leader even if he was a complete screwup like Obama.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John,_King_of_England
John (24 December 1166 – 19 October 1216), also known as John Lackland (Norman French: Johan sanz Terre),[1] was King of England from 6 April 1199 until his death in 1216. Following the battle of Bouvines, John lost the duchy of Normandy to King Philip II of France, which resulted in the collapse of most of the Angevin Empire and contributed to the subsequent growth in power of the Capetian dynasty during the 13th century. The baronial revolt at the end of John’s reign led to the sealing of the Magna Carta, a document sometimes considered to be an early step in the evolution of the constitution of the United Kingdom.


I’m really surprised they didn’t take his head after so many losses.


22 posted on 06/22/2014 5:51:01 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Probably needed to make an example out of him.


27 posted on 06/22/2014 6:02:54 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson