FUNYT. Your hag Hillary is in trouble.
If anybody knows about circuses it’s the clowns on the editorial board at the New Yawk Slimes. On the other hand, I really enjoy watching the commies squirm as we Americans close in on their boy.
The New Yawk Slimes, holding true to its slimy tradition.
“Benghazi kangaroo court”! LOL! Is that the best Barry’s Kids at the Slimes can do? They’re never going to make good communists.
Isn’t this the same NYT that ran 90 Front Page stories in 70 days on Abu Garaib, where nobody died from having panties on their heads ?
Once again, the New York Times validates my beloved Tagline.
I think that this one is the most blatant piece of propaganda written since Dr. Goebbels “retired”.
Also, considering what the Time will not touch, I could alternate with “NY TIMES: We print the news IF it fits our views.” Either one works pretty good.
Holy Shi! Now I’ve read partisan editorials before and typically they try to throw in a slant to the other side to pretend they are not too left. However with this one they make no bones about it. The editorial board is proudly donning the kneepads mouth wide open and accepting of the “one’s” gift.
You mean, Keystone?
This editorial is nothing but a temper tantrum.
I remember a time, not too long ago, when the New York Times presented its views with mature dignity, attempting to veneer its Left wing bias with skilled sophistry. Now we are treated to childish screeds worthy of MSNBC.
So. The Left is LAUGHING at the idea of justice for the dead.
The Butcher of Bebnghazi is glad. So is 0bama.
What a disgusting pile of crap from a once-great newspaper
If there was any doubt before about NYT being a mouthpiece for the Demonrats, then this should erase them.
Oh, and the “jobs bill” LOL,what a farce
Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods and Glen Dougherty could not be reached for comment.
They won’t pass a serious jobs bill, or raise the minimum wage, or reform immigration
The Slimes expects Republicans to act like Democrats...this isn’t Cuba yet!
I haven't read a New York Slimes editorial in decades, so the shrill, abrasive tone of this one kind of surprised me to some extent. Obviously, I knew they would be partisan pro-'Rat, but this is the kind of no holds barred rhetoric that you would not even expect to hear from Jay Carney. They are going to way more of a rhetorical extreme in excoriating the House Select Committee - even before it's established - than they ever would do in years past with any House or Senate committee, even HUAC or Sen. Joseph McCarthy's committee, for example. It's the tone that's so completely changed, from scholarly to off-the-wall, from an era when they were considered by most the number one daily newspaper in the country to today, when they are not much better than cover wrapping for the bottom of your bird cage.
They are really afraid of the truth coming out on this one.
I see the times did not answer any of the questions that were asked of the press by trey gowdy.
We are in interesting times, indeed. Things need to move quickly though, dragging it out will lead to public disinterest on both sides.
What do you call the Nina Burleigh Press if it is made up of men?
The New York Times contingent.
TREASON - continuous, IN-YOUR-FACE, agenda-driven, agency-abetted, representative-enabled, MEDIA-COMPLICIT, ongoing...