Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sodpoodle

Yes, 35 was the measure, yet I’ve met younger and older mothers of down syndrome children. I know a family whose first child had downs and the younger 4 didn’t. So while it seems age plays a factor, it certainly isn’t the only factor.


37 posted on 04/22/2014 12:49:24 PM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: This I Wonder32460

In my own family - My mother had 6th child at 42. One niece had 1st child at 40, 2nd at 43. One niece had 1st child at 43. No problems. All very bright healthy children. I expect that when families had 10-12 kids over a period of 20 years - this might not have been so unusual.


42 posted on 04/22/2014 2:45:54 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson