Posted on 03/31/2014 10:05:28 AM PDT by Red Badger
she certainly is a beautiful woman, and a great American, who happens to have a voice like chalk on chalk board.
.....as opposed to Hilary's voice that sounds like FINGERNAILS on the chalkboard..............
Thank you for the link...I wonder if that’s Ambassador Stevens in the pic. The site doesn’t say specifically...unless I missed it.
When the country as we have known it ceases to be, our grandchildren will read about how Sarah Palin might have saved the USA, except her voice wasn’t what some demanded and so they lost their last, best chance to save America.
As one pundit so eloquently put it, “Hilary sounds like every man’s ex wife.”..................
Why is it whether a person has a vagina or a penis a reason to vote for somebody?
I have never understood this mentality.
Because of my beliefs I am not an accepted member of the gay community (they consider me a traitor) because I have in the past criticized other homosexuals for not having a world view that extends beyond their genitals.
It is the same for women as well. After 2012, when I see a single women I automatically assume they are incompetent and incapable of taking care of themselves. I also believe they are for the most part whores that care more about free birth control and slaughtering their unborn babies than they do about the economy jobs liberty and the ability they have to take care of themselves. They are not feminists as it seems the left has twisted that definition as well.
The selfish identity politics has to stop. This goes for any victim group. Stop being victims.
When this country ceases to be, I doubt you, me or Sarah Palin will be written into History books.
Even now, George Washington is hardly mentioned.
According to Common Core, Cass Sunstein is a great American.
It’s all about power, ‘quotas’ and ‘firsts’ and the bragging rights that come with them. Once the threshold has been lowered to the point that the Left deems it probable to be profitable for them they go ‘all in’ to attain the power that comes with the particular office.
The Left gets their votes in ‘groups’: unions, minorities, women, gays, poor, uneducated and environmentalists, just to name a few.
Each group or identity will be fully exploited to keep them in the fold with whatever they want for themselves and their group.
Unions: higher minimum wages and easier collective bargaining rules, minorities: more preferential treatment, women: abortion rights and more women in office, gays: marriage rights, poor: more free stuff, enviros: more regulations restricting the use of land and private property.
The media is complicit with the agenda, whatever it is for each election and will do its utmost to be proactive towards that goal.
They have apparently decided that this coming presidential election will be about electing the ‘First Female President’. That is a huge ‘group’ to entice into the fold, 52-53 percent of the population. Many will vote for the female for the same reason that Obozo got elected, “I voted for the first (black, female, whatever) President of the US.” Those kind of voters are not just stupid, they are dangerous to this nation’s security and prosperity. Look what Obozo has done to this country in five and a half short years.
Stop being a victim is easy to say, but not easy to do. Generations of people have been trained and groomed into believing that someone else is responsible for their situation and they have a right to someone else’s wealth and hard work. You’re not gonna change that over night. Common Core, Title IX and just about every other federal program is geared to making victims, not making self reliant citizens. That’s the very last thing they want, if ever. .........
Palin stared down international oil company execs. And won.
Palin took international oil execs to court. And won.
Palin sued the W. Bush administration. And won.
So.
Palin has proven authoritative bona fides. And if there are international misogynists, let them try to tangle with Palin once. They won’t again.
Cruz is younger than Palin.
Cruz has less governing experience.
Cruz has virtually no executive experience.
All the facts point to Palin for president first, appointing Cruz to a Cabinet position. Or championing him to be Senate Majority Leader.
And yet you posit the younger man with less experience should be president first, and appoint the woman to serve on his cabinet.
Could it possibly be you who are the misogynist?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.