Posted on 03/08/2014 1:25:00 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
On February 23, five days before Russia invaded Ukraine, National Security Adviser Susan Rice appeared on Meet the Press and shrugged off suggestions that Russia was preparing any kind of military intervention: Its in nobodys interest to see violence returned and the situation escalate. A return to a Cold War construct isnt necessary, Rice insisted, because such thinking is long out of date and doesnt reflect the realities of the 21st century. Even if Vladimir Putin sees the world this way, Rice argued, it is not in the United States interests to do so.
It was a remarkably transparent case of pretending the world is what we wish it to be, rather than seeing it as it is.
On February 28, Russian troops poured into Ukraine. As they did, Secretary of State John Kerry spoke to Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, his Russian counterpart. Kerry briefed reporters after their talk, plainly unaware of the developments on the ground. Kerry said that Russia wants to help Ukraine with its economic problems. Lavrov had told him that they are prepared to be engaged and be involved in helping to deal with the economic transition that needs to take place at this point.
Hours later, television screens across the world displayed images of Russian soldiers infiltrating Crimea and Russian artillery rolling through Sevastopol. Obama administration officials told CNNs Barbara Starr that the incursion was not an invasion but an uncontested arrival and that this distinction was key to understanding the new developments.
But euphemism cant alter reality. So, President Obama delivered a statement: The United States will stand with the international community in affirming that there will be costs for any military intervention in Ukraine. The White House wasnt quite ready to lead the international community in a response to an intervention that was underway, but with the snarl of a puppy, the president announced we would stand with others if the uncontested arrival somehow turned into real military intervention. (Thirty minutes after his warning, no doubt meant to convey toughness and resolve, Obama appeared at a Democratic National Committee pep rally and declared the opening of happy hour.)
Four days later, with Russia in effective control of Ukraines Crimean peninsula, Vladimir Putin held a press conferencea rambling series of claims and statements that sometimes contradicted each other and often contradicted reality. Putin maintained, for instance, that there were no Russian troops on the ground in Ukraine, and that the Russian-speaking soldiers who often identified themselves as Russian soldiers were probably local defense groups who may well have bought their uniforms from military surplus stores.
Where others saw the agitprop of an emboldened authoritarian, the White House chose to see hope. Administration officials seized on one sentence of his blather and expressed optimism. Regarding the deployment of troops, the use of armed forces so far, there is no need for it. . . . Such a measure would certainly be the very last resort, Putin said. Obama national security officials saw this claimwhich came days after Russian troops had been deployedas evidence that Putin was looking for an off-ramp. And soon we had a name for this new Obama approach to the crisis: de-escalation.
Its not de-escalation, its delusion. And its dangerous. The public seems to understand this. In a Fox News poll released March 6, Obamas foreign policy approval rating fell to a new lowat just 33 percent (56 percent disapprove).
For five years, the Obama administration has chosen to see the world as they wish it to be, not as it is. In this fantasy world, the attack in Fort Hood is workplace violence. The Christmas Day bomber is an isolated extremist. The attempted bombing in Times Square is a one-off attack. The attacks in Benghazi are a spontaneous reaction to a YouTube video. Al Qaeda is on the run. Bashar al-Assad is a reformer. The Iranian regime can be sweet-talked out of its nuclear weapons program. And Vladimir Putin is a new, post-Cold War Russian leader.
In the real world, it was a pen pal of the late jihadist Anwar al-Awlaki who opened fire on soldiers at Fort Hood. The Christmas bomber was dispatched from Yemen, where he was instructed by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. The Times Square bomber was trained and financed by the Pakistani Taliban. Benghazi was a deliberate attack launched by well-known terrorist groups. Al Qaeda is amassing territory and increasing its profile. Assad is a brutal dictator, responsible for the deaths of more than 100,000 Syrians. The Iranian regime is firmly entrenched as the worlds foremost state sponsor of terror and remains determined to lead a nuclear state. And in Russia we face a Cold War throwback willing to use force to expand Russian influence.
And Vladimir Putin, it turns out, is who we thought he was. Unfortunately, so is Barack Obama.
Very good post. I would add that the exit of Crimea from the Ukrainian sphere would alter the political landscape in Ukraine in a positive way.
Crimeans have always seen themselves as Russians, and vote accordingly. It should be easier for greater Ukraine to nominate and elect more Euro-centric candidates without Crimea.
Now, if we could just get the Russians to invade New York and California......
Excellent post , thanks for the illumination.
Good luck if you’ve never been lied to by a moslem. You are in for a world of hurt. American electorate is gullible like sheep - easy to lead - easy prey. Cynical liars know which lies work best, keep track and form public opinion along those lines. . Sleepwalking into the next global caliphate is a terrible way to die. The talking heads are all asleep or blind, paid off or too stupid to see the light.
Those who read the Weekly Standard are the low information voters. Those who are well informed reject the views of the NeoCons, Weekly Standard, John McCain, Linda Graham, Rumsfeld, etc.
When a nation decides that fantasy trumps reality, disaster follows.
This also goes for homosexual “marriage,” women in combat, etc.
America has been living in a fantasy world for decades—We are being mislead by our successes—Hubris, arrogance, and downright propaganda. We are just one nation and we can’t bend others to our right thinking will. Putin will win this round—as he won in Georgia before. To the Russian Mind—Criema IS Russian—so its not like taking land from another country—its more like restoration. We better watch out—some Russians think that Alaska should be their “greater Russia” and that we hoodwinked them out of it. We don’t want to fight with these guys—not if we can help it.
They don't have to occupy us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.