So it’s not 6000 years but instead 7000 or 8000 or 10,000. That’s still a whole lot different than the 4.6 billion years that science teaches and is still a number that flies in the face of scientific evidence. Yet we’re supposed to belive that Science is wrong because Ham said so, and that Ham is right because he claims God said so? No thanks.
No, “science” isn’t “wrong”. And hammers aren’t “wrong”, either.
It’s a tool for examining the observable.
Please watch the debate.
In that debate at the Creation Museum, Mr. Ham pointed to several instances where scientists were wrong and if they were wrong before it is highly probable that they are wrong now.
There is no “scientific evidence” for an old Earth.
There is technocratic propaganda, manufactured out of thin air, that apparently has you hooked, but it is in no way ‘science.’
There is plenty of science here: http://www.setterfield.org/
But I know you’re afraid to touch it.
.