I don’t know much about what Pollard did but I know wikipedia is a cesspool of liberalism, so if they are on his side, I am probably not.
fyi: The majority of those who understand that Pollard should have been released long since are political CONSERVATIVES. Palmer, you’ve got the scenario all wrong. You’re claiming the opposite of the reality. Those who organize and march for Pollard are CONSERVATIVES. Wake up and smell the coffee. If you are really interested in the full picture with an open mind, please do much more critical research on this topic.
p.s. I included the Wiki article of Pollard because this particular article seemed a balanced and informative one. I’m not here to defend Wikipedia in any blanket way, but it does not infrequently wind up providing an excellent first place to look on many topics and this was one. Given the extremely Leftist bias of so many news sources and publishers, Wiki paradoxically has wound up being as good as it gets in many, surely not all, cases, despite the Left’s clear aim at dominating it. You can post there, too, if you have have verified information and wish to post.
p.p.s. Having said that Wiki is often a good beginning - not final or complete - source for researching a topic, I am distressed at articles being scrubbed from Wikipedia, such as the article about the recently dead Loretta Fuddy of Hawaii.