Posted on 12/31/2013 6:11:55 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Unable to comment on the "Duck Dynasty" controversy last week due to my hectic Kwanzaa schedule, I am able to sweep in at the end and comment on the commentary.
Anyone who utters the mind-numbingly obvious point that A&E's suspension of "Duck Dynasty" star Phil Robertson doesn't involve the First Amendment because a TV network is not the government, should be prohibited from ever talking in public again. You can bore your few remaining friends with laborious statements of the obvious, but stop wasting everyone else's time.
We know A&E is not the government. It may shock your tiny little pea brains, but free speech existed even before we had a Constitution. Free speech is generally considered a desirable goal even apart from its inclusion in the nation's founding document.
Suppose TV networks were capitulating to angry Muslims by suspending people for saying they opposed Sharia law? Would that prompt any of you pusillanimous hacks to finally take a position on the state of free speech in America?(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Ann Coulter: “But liberals can’t grasp that God is not our imaginary friend, who says whatever we want Him to say, when we want Him to say it.”
The left really does seem to think they make up God as they go. Christians, on the other hand, follow the Bible. Believe what it says...or not, but it’s not for us to pick and choose what it says.
Really? Had to look that on up. LOL!
Hey, did they repeal the Coulter rule? The one where you had to add a pic of her?
As usual, she is right on.
How do we know they wouldn't? After all, no one has tried it on a show yet...
What Ann is talking about is natural law
I’ll bet if you’d get Ann out in a nice private bar over a couple of drinks, she’d open up and tell you what she really thinks ;-)
I do think “The Anus Monologues” would be a great addition to the MSNBC primetime lineup.
Make no mistake, these are still very powerful people, mostly because they've been able to hide behind the shield of victimhood and its corollary, the concept of "hate speech". One must "die for your right to say it" but only if it's pre-approved. It does not appear to occur to gay activists that the tools they're using on other people may boomerang.
It's long past time for a little blowback. The longer it's suppressed, denied, marginalized, derided, and dismissed by the media, the worse it's going to be.
Yup, it’s all about equating the anus to the vagina.
Misogyny — it’s not only a 3rd World trait, Western Leftists dig it too!
“Unable to comment on the “Duck Dynasty” controversy last week due to my hectic Kwanzaa schedule”
LOL!
[ Yup, it’s all about equating the anus to the vagina.
Misogyny — it’s not only a 3rd World trait, Western Leftists dig it too! ]
Female Circumcision ie. Muslim Genital Mutilation on females.... I ALL about turning the vaginal area into a Anus to match the experience of screwing young dancing boys so when they are at home with Hajib Hefy Bag Lady they can feel the same tightness....
No wonder the sick libs are silent on FGM...
Hey Ann, wasn’t it you that was all googly eyed for more of these activist gays in the Republican party?
Yea it was. So your words here ring sorta hypocritical. That happens to you a lot lately.
One of her best. Are the Marxists ok with the rest of the sins and only upset with homosexuality?
Pray America is Waking
Let me be among the first to say that Robertson is absolutely spot on with this crude analogy and the make-up of the human body fully supports it.
Vaginal lining is at least three times as thick as anal lining. It is designed to receive a certain intimate foreign object and contract with muscular receptors which make said foreign object react, expand and give pleasure in return for the pleasure it receives, usually culminating in an ejaculation which is generally as pleasurable for the female organ as it is for the male organ. Feminists may disagree, but real women do not.
Anal muscular structure does none of these things as it is designed only for expelling poop from the lower intestine. That ain't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of physiological fact. Anal lining tears far more easily than vaginal lining, takes longer to heal and is far more susceptible as a source of and entry for disease.
Those who argue that homosexual activity is as pleasurable as heterosexual intercourse are even more stupid than those who would claim superior intimate experience with masturbation or a dildo.
Sorry if I offend anyone's sensitivities, but those are the facts. An anus has the ever present potential to spread disease, including fatal diseases, when it comes in penetrative contact with a penis. A vagina, on the other hand, can only contact and spread those diseases by allowing infected private parts to come into penetrative contact with it.
Further, said diseases, as bad as they may be, are generally only fatal if the infecting organ has been in or been infected by another organ which has penetrated an anus somewhere along the line.
IOW, nature has even worse consequences for homosexual activity than it has for wantonly promiscuous heterosexual activity. AIDS did not even exist before the normalization of homosexuality begin.
We are seeing in near-time the conflicts of those foundations between the secularists and Christians.
It's the difference between preaching to the Greeks Vs. the Jews.
The left and the media establishment are all Greek.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBZlfHwJ1lY
Better, thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.