Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: catnipman

-——I don’t see any “there” there-—

I tend to agree.

It can be well argued that Tarango was mostly going along in agreement rather than just say no. He was being pressured pretty hard to produce and pretty elicited the problems.

He also knew the law cold. It is likely he was being very cautious in his words to entertain a wacko scheme.


99 posted on 11/21/2013 4:57:23 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: bert

Agreed. Unless there is more video to come, this doesn’t amount to a whole lot. At this point, he may be saying some things that are questionable, but he hasn’t acted anything out.


101 posted on 11/21/2013 5:02:27 AM PST by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: bert; catnipman

Perhaps this video is the setting the stage for another O’Keefe corruption exposure series. Otherwise, it is much ado about nothing.


104 posted on 11/21/2013 5:05:29 AM PST by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: bert

“It can be well argued that Tarango was mostly going along in agreement rather than just say no.”

Yeah, that was my exact thought too. He might have been just jollying the guy along and hoping he’d go away.


116 posted on 11/21/2013 7:51:52 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson