To: jimbo123
Laws restricting our God-given right to keep and bear arms by definition infringe on that right. Such laws are thus inherently and unavoidably unconstitutional. It’s not a hard concept to understand, and no legitimate government would try to work around the protections of our basic human rights.
46 posted on
11/07/2013 10:23:28 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Pollster1
Laws restricting our God-given right to keep and bear arms by definition infringe on that right. Such laws are thus inherently and unavoidably unconstitutional. Its not a hard concept to understand, and no legitimate government would try to work around the protections of our basic human rights.Try explaining that to a cop who doesn't see any contradiction between "presumption of innocence" and their efficacious tactic of lying to a suspect to obtain incriminating evidence.
70 posted on
11/07/2013 11:45:47 AM PST by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson