Then why are we discussing this anyway?
Do we need a translator?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Actually, it was ‘The World’ that said that U.S.-led airstrikes on Syria would be “unbelievably small”.
2 posted on
09/09/2013 11:35:04 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Don't blame me for McCain.)
To: Sub-Driver
Hey Jay, I’m not focusing on the word “small”, as are you.
I’m focusing on the word “unbelievable”. As in, “John Kerry and Jay Carney are unbelievable”.
3 posted on
09/09/2013 11:36:08 AM PDT by
Nervous Tick
(Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
To: Sub-Driver
5 posted on
09/09/2013 11:36:37 AM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(The Presidency is broken.)
To: Sub-Driver
White House press secretary Jay Carney said Secretary of State John Kerrys assertion that U.S.-led airstrikes on Syria would be unbelievably small was only in context to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Unbelievably small - as small as a grain of rice.
6 posted on
09/09/2013 11:37:04 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
(Just a common, ordinary, simple savior of America's destiny.)
To: Sub-Driver
unbelievably small was only in context to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Even if we assume this is correct, don't you think statements from the Secretary and State and President concerning the potential launch of missiles into a sovereign nation should be "unbelievably clear" and not need further clarifications and interpretations?
These people are idiots. Their decisions have, and will kill people, and they think it's a freaking game?
To: Sub-Driver
HAHAHAHAHA....Carney is a BAD Joke of a man.
WTF do you call Bombing another country??? They REALLY think we are all so STUPID like THEIR VOTERS!!
8 posted on
09/09/2013 11:38:55 AM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Sub-Driver
Yes - These attacks will just about the same size as Pearl Harbor...
9 posted on
09/09/2013 11:39:05 AM PDT by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Sub-Driver
Everything about John Frenchman Kerry is small except his ego and his wife’s financial statement.
10 posted on
09/09/2013 11:40:10 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Don't twerk me, Bro!)
To: Sub-Driver
Who knows that the attack will perhaps only be on the scale of the raid on the Koresh compound at Waco, TX.
11 posted on
09/09/2013 11:41:33 AM PDT by
353FMG
( I will not say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
To: Sub-Driver
White House: Kerry did not gaffeBecause that is crazy Joe Biden's job.
12 posted on
09/09/2013 11:41:43 AM PDT by
South40
To: Sub-Driver
This is The Onion.
Or John Semmens.
‘Cause no real Whitehouse could issue such a lame statement.
Really.
13 posted on
09/09/2013 11:43:45 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Are Marines required to salute Al Qaeda yet?)
To: Sub-Driver
He didn't gaffe. It's just that his talking points weren't sufficiently seared -- seared -- into his memory. Coulda happened to anybody.
15 posted on
09/09/2013 11:45:10 AM PDT by
Maceman
(Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
To: Sub-Driver
Kerr-ee, you soo tee tee. Me not hawney.
We go boom boom ricky tick.
18 posted on
09/09/2013 11:49:25 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
To: Sub-Driver
Kerry: Unbelievably small strike.
19 posted on
09/09/2013 11:50:03 AM PDT by
RedMDer
(http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
To: Sub-Driver
And Clinton did not have sex with that woman.
20 posted on
09/09/2013 11:51:05 AM PDT by
justlurking
(tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
To: Sub-Driver
“Kerry didn’t gaffe. This is the most smartest administration in history. No one in the Obama administration gaffes. [Be quiet, Mr. Vice President].”
22 posted on
09/09/2013 12:02:02 PM PDT by
Paine in the Neck
(Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
To: Sub-Driver
The entirety of this administration is a colossal embarassment.
23 posted on
09/09/2013 12:02:24 PM PDT by
informavoracious
(We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby. Obamacare: shovel-ready healthcare.)
To: Sub-Driver
Exactly why would the unbelievably small man in our White House need congressional approval to do something unbelievably small? This entire debate seems absurd: “watch out or I’ll ask Congress if I can do something unbelievably small” would not intimidate anyone more manly than a second-rate community organizer. It is far too late to worry about protecting Obama’s credibility.
25 posted on
09/09/2013 12:19:16 PM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Sub-Driver
Has any bicycle, anywhere, ever been peddled backward, as quickly as this administration has backpeddled it’s various policy statments, since it’s inception?
30 posted on
09/09/2013 12:32:43 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
To: Sub-Driver
Since when would lobbing upwards to a billion dollars worth of weapons at an adversary not be considered a war?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson