Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjsheridan5

“As far as social policy is concerned, all of this is in a sense hypothetical.”

See my #1 below. You are performing true to form. Abortions are not “hypothetical”.

“Every time a conservative calls this out, libertarians on this site either pretend that the social stuff is invisible (downplay it), scold conservatives that they really don’t understand libertarian ideology, or become “cafeteria Catholics” and tell us how we must pick and choose our issues.


167 posted on 09/03/2013 3:19:39 PM PDT by Owl558 (Those who remember George Santayana are doomed to repeat him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: Owl558

You obviously cannot read with any degree of accuracy, so I will spell this out even more clearly for the reading impaired. I never said that abortions were “hypothetical”. I said that political philosophy, in certain circumstances, was hypothetical. If you cannot understand the difference, I pity you.

In addition, on a separate issue, I never once mentioned abortion. But since you will only hear what you expect to hear, explaining further is pointless. It is people like you, incapable of rational discourse, which give conservatism a bad name. Good day.


170 posted on 09/03/2013 6:16:45 PM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson