Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vince Ferrer

That’s totally misleading. The population CALLING THEMSELVES ROMAN declined but the decline population was not nearly that Dramatic. Tet were known by other names like Britains, Saxons, Franks , etc.


26 posted on 09/02/2013 1:14:01 PM PDT by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak
That’s totally misleading. The population CALLING THEMSELVES ROMAN declined but the decline population was not nearly that Dramatic. Tet were known by other names like Britains, Saxons, Franks , etc.

That might make it even more appropriate. We will find that people in this region will call themselves Aztlaners or muslims.

29 posted on 09/02/2013 2:29:05 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak; Vince Ferrer
The population CALLING THEMSELVES ROMAN declined but the decline population was not nearly that Dramatic. Tet were known by other names like Britains, Saxons, Franks , etc.

Post 6 references the population of the City of Rome, and is more or less accurate.

The population of Europe indeed crashed from 200 to 1000 AD, with massive areas returning to forest, but not by anything like 99%.

33 posted on 09/02/2013 3:17:07 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Mark Steyn: "In the Middle East, the enemy of our enemy is also our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson