Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul R.

I see your point. So you’re saying it’s not in Putin’s (and therefore not in Syrian or Hizbollah’s) interest to involve Israel at this point? That is to say, America launches 37 Tomahawks and Syria, Hizbollah, Iran, HAMAS do nothing is response?


155 posted on 08/26/2013 12:52:53 AM PDT by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Netz; Paul R.

It isn’t that they would do nothing.
Israel will get attacked by somebody out of opportunity regardless.
But attacking Israel won’t hurt Obama.
He hates and despises Israel.
They would have to retaliate in some other way at another location that would hurt zero greatly.


156 posted on 08/26/2013 12:58:35 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: Netz
I see your point. So you’re saying it’s not in Putin’s (and therefore not in Syrian or Hizbollah’s) interest to involve Israel at this point?

Exactly, at least regarding Russia, Syria and Iran.

Syria, Hizbollah, Iran, HAMAS do nothing is response?

I'm not saying that at all. There are plenty of options, especially for Syria and Iran, that do not involve Israel. HAMAS or Hezbollah might hit Israel, but I suspect Hezbollah is pretty well tied up assisting Assad presently anyway.

There's no need to exclude Russia, though. If we hit Assad hard enough, Putin could, as others have suggested, respond by sinking a British ship in the area. THEN what do we do?

165 posted on 08/26/2013 1:49:35 AM PDT by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson