Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
I see no reason for private citizens like myself to be making armed patrols of public property.

That's what the prosecution said about Zimmerman. And maybe if the amount of crime was low enough no citizen would need to leave their house armed. And no citizen would feel the need to try to prevent crime in their area. But apparently that is not the situation in Arizona.

Law enforcement officers encounter armed civilians patrolling in lots of circumstances, including in office buildings, shopping centers, and at banks. Around power plants they also encounter armed security teams, and at some installations those teams look more like a Seal Team than a group of mall cops.

Coordination and cooperation should be the goal, not the kind of threats the Sheriff was making. The militia members need to cooperate with the LEOs too, since they presumably have the same goal. But the threats by Sheriff Arpaio evidence an attitude which is counterproductive. Would he want citizens to have the same attitude towards his men if they were on private property? I would certainly hope not.

20 posted on 08/20/2013 8:16:57 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: freeandfreezing

“That’s what the prosecution said about Zimmerman.”

The owners of the property approved of Zimmerman’s Neighborhood Watch. And concealed carry is legal. Zimmerman was in a NEIGHBORHOOD. He wasn’t patrolling an Interstate, or going out on state of federal land. He was ALSO in contact with the police...


46 posted on 08/21/2013 6:25:40 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson