Skip to comments.Oklahoma's ban on Sharia law thrown out by federal judge
Posted on 08/17/2013 3:05:54 PM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
No, it would be the “will of the people”. Chances are the money trail for this goes back to Saudi Arabia.
All of the other arguments aside, what we have here is yet another example of judicial tyranny. The will of the people have been negated by a person in a black robe, and this one happens to be a liberal, black, muslim homosexual to boot! I hope an appeal can be mounted against her ruling.
Why? It means more power for them.
People in OK never supported their neighbor, B. Clinton, but they can redeem themselves in 2016 by voting for Hillary over Jebbie.
Did Inhofe vote to confirm this judge?
Oklahoma native educated via ghana, vassar and howard
clinton appointment 1994
Other than the court’s decision essentially being a preemptive strike against the law if there were no actual cases of somebody’s constitutional rights being abridged by the law, I don’t see what the fuss is all about. Both Christians and Muslims are protected, by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, from state laws which go too far in abridging constitutional privileges and immunities.
What the states should have are recall laws which permit voters to remove and penalize bad-apple judges who use their power to attack a given religion.
So what am I overlooking?
There is rampant ignorance all around in that rodeo——Sharia law is not religous/religion/faith related or anything of the sort. Sharia is tribal law, or more accurately tribal custom since it always is applied the way the chief says it should be. The Soddies , for example, are great at making it up as they go. It happens that Arabs/mooslims/Persians/etc. use Sharia interchangeably but note that the largest mooslim bunch, the Indonesians, just don’t mention Sharia. Sharia is not/doesn’t have to be, an integral part of islam.
If the Okies do their homework they can get this done.
Under sharia law the judge would be home nursing her genitalia.
This says it all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicki_Miles-LaGrange
Folks we are screwed!
Picture says it all!
How can this anything remotely related to the "establishment clause?"
Here’s some links to its publication usage; I’m afraid to clink on some of the first few links. Heh.
What little would be left of them that is....
So according to this ruling all I have to do is create my own religion with a set of parallel laws and I can have them enforced. I propose Grace-ology with a law that says all statist control freaks shall be executed.......
Dumbass idiot judge just open the door to screwball cults having their own damned courts.....
Things were bad enough without having that photo posted. Dangit!
Now that I know that it's one of Holder/Sharpie/Jackass' Peeps she is beyond criticism!
< /sarc >
we are truly screwed...
Sharia being all constitutional and everything.
You see, if you want to live according to Christian principles, its a violation of the famous separation of church and state clause that everyone finds hidden between the lines of the constitution. But if you want to impose Sharia, thats jake.
Outlawing sharia, that violates the separation of church and state because as we understand, under sharia, the religion *is* the state.
Corruption, thy name is Democrat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.