Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Crusades Reconsidered
American Thinker ^ | August 11, 2013 | Mike Konrad

Posted on 08/11/2013 6:48:56 AM PDT by NCjim

One of the idiocies passed off for decades among Western historians is bemoaning the Crusades as evil. The Islamic world -- the Ummah -- has disseminated this imaginary charge against the West, and like fools, we have absorbed Arab lies and taken the blame to heart. But the most superficial reading of Western history should put that canard to rest.

Shortly before he died in June 632 AD, Mohammed ordered Muslims to prepare to wage war against the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire.

Upon his death, Mohammed's successor, Abu Bakr, planned to fulfill those instructions. Plans were also made to conquer Zoroastrian Sassanid Persia.

This vainglorious troop of bandits should have been easily dispatched,

However. Persia and Byzantine Rome had just come out of a savagely vicious war which ended in 628 AD. Emperor Heraclius had finally imposed the total defeat over Persia that had eluded the earlier Roman Republic and the Caesars -- but Byzantine Rome, though victorious, was severely mauled. Persia was reduced to a state of anarchy; and forced to pay indemnities to Constantinople.

The Persian and Eastern Roman empires were attacked almost simultaneously around 633 AD, while both were still licking their wounds. So frightening were the Islamic advances that these former blood enemies made a sadly futile alliance. By 644, Persia fell anyway.

By 634 AD, Byzantine Palestine and Syria were being attacked. The Battle of Yarmouk in August 636 AD would see Eastern Roman forces beaten. Emperor Heraclius, the victorious warrior, a mere 8 years earlier, would have to sneak out back to Constantinople in a boat.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crusades
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: Venturer
A new Crusade to lower their numbers would lead to a more peaceful world.

2 or 3 per state seems sufficient...

61 posted on 08/11/2013 2:52:59 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

.


62 posted on 08/11/2013 2:53:38 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
I am no historian by any means , but Muslims appear to be a fairly peaceful people as long as there are not too many of them

Surely you are not calling Muslims cowards?

63 posted on 08/11/2013 3:09:23 PM PDT by chesley (Vast deserts of political ignorance makes liberalism possible - James Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Now that’s interesting. Can you guide me to a reference? I’d appreciate it.


64 posted on 08/11/2013 3:14:33 PM PDT by chesley (Vast deserts of political ignorance makes liberalism possible - James Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
The act of terror in Boston did not place Islam in a favorable light with the population.

What? You mean those brothers were Muslim? I thought they were 'Chechen (never heard of that religion) but that's what NBCABCSeeBS told me. < /s >

Would they lie to me. ;~))

65 posted on 08/11/2013 7:27:27 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson