[Stayfree]

At first glance, Obama's failure to act could be explained as a fear that an attempt to repel the attackers could lead to massive bloodshed which would negate the campaign rhetoric that Al Qaeda is defeated. In other words, do nothing and hope that it all blows away which would be A SEVERE DERELICTION OF DUTY!!!!!!!!

On the other hand, when you add in the entire picture about not only the lack of security, but also the complete removal of all US security and the use of Libyan militia to guard the facility, a pattern begins to appear of a specific reason to strip the facility of all protection...and then the question becomes

WHY?

Now why would you strip the facility of all protection unless you expected a kidnapping to occur and wanted nobody hurt in the process, which explains why you couldn't have a bunch of special forces barging in on a peaceful kidnapping because things could get very messy with a lot of dead bodies in the news!!

Remember that Morsi was clamoring for the release of the blind sheik and that the CIA (who was also there, but separated for some unknown reason) had failed to secure thousands of shoulder-fire anti-aircraft missiles when Gaddafi fell which could become a huge problem in the wrong hands!!

Solution: Make a deal with Morsi to release the blind sheik in exchange for Stevens and the return of all the shoulder-fired missiles.

[txhurl]

Then be in such a rush in the coverup to declare ‘there wasn’t enough time’ to not realize you’re raising the question ‘WHAT? How did you KNOW there wasn’t enough time?!”

[Stayfree]

forgot this: “and become a hero in the US press right before the election!”