>> John trying to say that the guy on the bottom couls be the dominant position
Does it matter? Whether or not Z *theoretically could be* dominant from the bottom (in an MMA match, say) his injuries (and St. Trayvon’s lack of injuries) is strong evidence that Z was NOT in fact dominant from that position.
My take is that JG is just trying to be very fair and accurate, without appearing to favor one side or the other. When you boil down his facts, they favor GZ.
It’s a ludicrous statement by him as everyone in MMA knows that being on top straddling the guy on the bottom is the dominant position.