People see the headline without reading the decision.
"That alternative means of enforcing its constitutional power to determine voting qualifications remains open to Arizona here. Should the EAC reject or decline to act on a renewed request, Arizona would have the opportunity to establish in a reviewing court that a mere oath will not suffice to effectuate its citizenship requirements." [emphasis added]I think this is a signal from at a minimum Scalia that once the NVRA process is followed, there will be a sympathetic SCOTUS majority.
The fact that two Judges dissented is sufficient justification for believing that the majority of the court is nuts.
The powers that be depend upon that. I'll be reading through it tonight.
People see the headline without reading the decision.
Because thats all they want to see,,,just the headline.