How do you strike down a law requiring proof of citizenship to vote?
Who votes against that??
This is the case involving Arizonas requirement that would-be voters provide proof of citizenship before being able to register to vote. Arizonas proof of citizenship requirement is preempted by the federal law requiring that states use the federal voter registration form. Justice Kennedy concurs in part and in judgment. Justices Thomas and Alito both filed dissenting opinions.
By this logic, there should be nothing requiring proof of citizenship in this country.
Yes indeed, “O”s Regime has infected every facet and level of the Federal Gubment.
What in the legal reasoning of the decision do you disagree with? If you just object to the result you run the risk of sounding like a liberal who believes the courts should just make policy? This looks to be a decision based on pre-emption doctrine.
Arizona should immediately enact legislation that gives a $1,000 reward for turning in someone who is illegally registered to vote, and 10 years at Sherriff Joe’s Summer Camp for the offender.
Look, it’s really quite simple.
Roberts is no conservative. That’s now amply proven.