Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

NO TO OBAMA AND NO TO THE UNITED NATIONS

YES TO OUR SECOND AMENDMENT!!

1 posted on 06/11/2013 12:18:58 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yoe

Take the Senate in 2014 and impeach the usurping traitor!!


2 posted on 06/11/2013 12:21:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

That’s because the Constitution says that it takes 2/3 of those PRESENT in the Senate to ratify a treaty.


3 posted on 06/11/2013 12:22:54 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Obama is going to piggy back the Zimmerman trial outcome and associated hoopla -Obama is nothing if not manipulative.


6 posted on 06/11/2013 12:29:50 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Until ratified by the Senate it carries no force of law and can be ignored by the states.
8 posted on 06/11/2013 12:30:56 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Can they make some kind of new law or procedural step in the mean time to preclude him from doing this?
Why not a some of them stay for the sake of our Country?
10 posted on 06/11/2013 12:33:35 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.


12 posted on 06/11/2013 12:41:59 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

I’m not suprised. Let the guy sign it will never get ratified.


14 posted on 06/11/2013 12:53:45 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Another meaningless ceremony...


18 posted on 06/11/2013 1:17:36 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

That means he will sign it in secret.


21 posted on 06/11/2013 2:09:48 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

The timing is specific to a set of new threats. Global and stateside. The posturing of supposed leaks, is the prelude. Get safe, the hellstorm is here. May the breath of God, be upon our shoulders


26 posted on 06/11/2013 5:58:00 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

"Dude...you're doing it all wrong"
27 posted on 06/12/2013 3:14:44 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum -- "The Taliban is inside the building")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson