[Beagle8U]

“What you are saying is that the media should focus on John McCain along with Obama and Clinton.”

I said no such thing! Look Skippy, you speak for yourself.

My opinion on the matter was clearly stated. I don't really give a $hit if you like it or not!

[DoughtyOne]

McCain mixed himself with it. Obastard never could have done what he did without McCain.  He deserves to be blamed with the rest of them.

What you are saying is that the media should focus on John McCain along with Obama and Clinton.

I said no such thing! Look Skippy, you speak for yourself.

You said that Obama could never had done what he did without McCain.  Please explain why Obama couldn't have done what he did the night of the Benghazi attack, without McCain's help?

Be specific about what McCain did that night that made it possible for Obama to abandon our staff.  And please explain why you think that staff couldn't have been rescued that night.  If they could have been rescued, and McCain took no action that night at all, then the blame for Benghazi rest solely on the President and Secretary of State.

You can't go back to a blanket support of the insurgents in Libya, and convert that into blame for the dead diplomats.  If our diplomats could have been saved, and most folks think they could have, then nothing else matters related to the blame for what took place that night.

My opinion on the matter was clearly stated. I don't really give a $hit if you like it or not!

You opinion as expressed would lead any thinking person to realize that if McCain is to be blamed, then the media should be mentioning his name every time they discuss the issues surrounding Obama's and Clinton's actions.

If you don't want to be held accountable for the natural progression that would occur do to your policy advocacy, then advocate for something different.

Don't go into a hissy fit because you get called on it.