Posted on 06/02/2013 7:54:22 AM PDT by DFG
Texas Congressman Louie Gohmert has unearthed a new culprit in the Benghazi saga: fellow Republican John McCain.
Conservative radio host Frank Gaffney asked Gohmert to comment on McCains hobnobbing with jihadists during his recent trip to Syria. Gohmert brought up a similar trip of McCains to Libya, where he feels McCains policy to depose Muammar Gaddafi unleashed the Muslim extremist forces that later attacked the American Consulate in Benghazi.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Actually, I was agreeing with you.
The problem here is that Ghomert is attacking...I don’t see that as a problem any which way, form or reason.
Ghaddafy was a good little boy after that.
He turned over all his WMD voluntarily, because he knew what was coming if he did not.
What I still can’t quite define is why Obama suddenly decided to whack Ghadaffy when we finally had him playing nice.
Ghaddafy was not committing genocide like Bashir Assad is.
And whats up with Mubarak?
He was playing footsie with us for 30 years and Obama decides that he needs to be removed?
I am not defending McCain.
I am ACCUSING OBAMA!
I’m just thankful we still have people in the GOP who are ABLE to fume and be enraged.
And I’ll never understand how ditching three aircraft and being kidnapped qualifies one as a war hero.
If people want to address McCain evil support for terrorists fine.
If people want to address Obama and Clinton’s evil deeds related to Benghazi fine.
NEVER EVER mix the two topics.
Obama deserves to be removed from office for his inaction concerning Benghazi. Hillary deserves to lose her job and her chances of ever running for president.
These last two things are severely impacted by starting to blame McCain for Benghazi.
No matter what McCain did, that fateful night in Benghazi should never have happened the way it did.
If Obama and Clinton had ordered support in, our people would be alive today. That’s the only thing that counts.
I despise McCain. He is not responsible for that fateful night in Benghazi. No matter what he did, and we all agree his policy advocacy in Libya was terrible. Despite that, what happened that fateful night was preventable.
Obama decides that he needs to be removed?...All your examples, Khaddaffy, Assad, Mubarak were removed to establish the Islamic caliphate. Obummer could NOT tolerate secularists or anti-terrorists in power.
Daddy?
What did you do in the war?
I agree. And it’s just the sort of thing we are famous for.
We actually defuse the pressure on the rightful targets, by blurring the issues. Huge mistake...
Like Grover Al Norquist.
Conservatives screech about Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood immediately turn around and kiss Norquist’s muslim ass. I frankly fail to see how they’re any different than the democrats.
Dats right! Obama owns this and it was planned.
McCain is a distraction.
And Ill never understand how ditching three aircraft and being kidnapped qualifies one as a war hero.....’Cause Daddy was an Admiral, perhaps?
Seems you and I are in the minority.
I’m gonna a have a ciggie and refine my optics.
I wouldn’t trust them with my back.
Good for Rep. Gohmert! McCain and 0bama are two of the most dangerous idiots to hold office in modern history.
Our Number One Priority in Benghazi is getting the other half to even know what the word means!
Hell yeah I’m willing to sacrifice this doddering RAT to those ends!
Yes, sometimes it does seem like it. That’s what we’re here for, trying to explain what sound policy is, and hoping we make sense when we do it.
Agreed...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.