Posted on 04/19/2013 10:51:27 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
According to Chris Barry, a sophomore at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth and friend of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, said that Tsarnaev didnt seem like a dangerous person at all
He was a pothead, a normal pothead. I couldnt even imagine him being mad at someone, let alone hurting someone.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It’s already starting. The dead big brother is going to take the entire hit for this terrorist attack on women and children. Little brother is nothing but a nice little pothead who wouldn’t hurt a flea. Obviously, the big brother forced him do it against his will.
[[didnt seem like a dangerous person at all He was a pothead, a normal pothead]]
More proof that pot isn’t as innocuous as they claim- I’m pretty sure we’ll be seeign news stories abotu hte dangers of pot turnign folsk into bombers anytime soon
That asshole was smiling ear to ear right after he dropped the bomb next to the little kids.
Ted Bundy was a nice guy when he wasn’t killing you.
Just as alcohol is of Western Civilization, pot and hashish is of the middle east and that region of the world, asia/orient.
Both areas have despised the use of the other in their respective cultures over the thousands of years, while both being totally aware of both alcohol and cannabis.
Surely this is a moment for introspection.
And bad speelers, to.
Yes, this whole episode is clearly the fault, somehow, of libertarians.
Right?
Please grind your silly axe for us, ansel12.
RFLOL, What in God’s name are you rambling about?
What, pray tell, is a ‘normal’ pothead? I have never seen one in my entire life.
Oh look, you’re laughing like a fool.
I’m just bringing up your silly infatuation with libertarians. It’s natural to assume that when you write about marijuana it’s related to your libertarian obsession.
Why not read and post, and not reveal deep scars from earlier in your life.
Take each thread as it’s own.
yeah if you see any bad spellers be siure to lemme konw
Uh huh. You’re the fanatic here. Even your tagline reveals it.
LOL — you changed your fanatic tagline since I posted!
Oh isn’t that special...
No problem, the tagline is in post 10, it might revert back to that in a week or two but right now my old tag line from a few years ago is better suited to the current topics.
Yeah man, I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that you changed it a minute ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.