Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe

I’m really not interesting in looking up the definion of sodomy in 1965.


210 posted on 03/30/2013 5:27:08 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
lj, how can you say what people were for or against if you don't know what the definition in 1965 included?

Did you know that "sodomy" included a wife performing fellatio on her husband? A husband performing cunnilingus on his wife? It did, and those practices were becoming more popular about then, whatever your personal opinion of them is.

They were not homosexual acts, but were defined as "Sodomy". Which meant the government was asserting dominion over the marriage bed in the privacy of their home. That is why heterosexuals fought sodomy laws in the 1960s and 1970s. Homosexuals were still in the closet, or wherever they went.

Now, without taking a stand on that issue, merely pointing out an historical fact, ansel12 has gone completely batsh*t and said I somehow support the faggots.

No. Not Now, Not ever.

But if you aren't concerned with facts, you won't see that either.

214 posted on 03/30/2013 5:33:25 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson