[Carry_Okie]

It's his.

I'd have waited a couple of more years.

Have no basis in our Nations history and are not germane to the lead article. So far, the only thing you've done on this thread is try to provide cover for these illegal actions by California "law" enforcement and to throw up strawmen.

Poppycock. The article demonstrated an illegitimate standard for deprivation of rights. I proposed a legitimate standard, a court trial with appeals. It's the same standard as for committing people to prison. You just couldn't deal with it.

[Dead Corpse]

You waded in with an attack on another poster. When called on it, you backed up and started in with this other completely irrelevant crap.

Classic concern troll.

[from occupied ga]

I proposed a legitimate standard, a court trial with appeals. It's the same standard as for committing people to prison.

The standard you proposed is as you say for punishing people who committed a crime. What you're proposing is applying this to people who have NOT commited a crime, but rather you're imposing prior restraint on people who are not guilty of any criminal activiy. This is the sort of thing that tyrannies love to do, but has no place in a free country. Slippery slope - apparently a concept that you can't acknowledge.

You just couldn't deal with it.

I would say that the posters here have dealt with your liberal ideas just as they deserved to be dealt with.