Holder Admits It’s Unconstitutional for Gov’t to Kill US Citizen Sitting Peacefully in U.S. in Café

Cybercast News Service ^ | March 6, 2013 | Melanie Hunter

[txrefugee]

Sen. Cruz is not stupid. Watch your mouth.

Inform yourself as to his background and learn something before exposing your own ignorance.

[Albion Wilde]

He meant to say the word “no” but somehow the word “appropriate” came out.

"No" and "thou shalt not" are concepts that were time-tested even by the time they were recognized in the Bible.

"Appropriate" is a concept that came out of comparatively recent, unproven, secular social sciences like psychology.

In other words, "appropriate" is crap.

[Albion Wilde]

Add to that list of blamees: pro-life activists.

[Travis McGee]

This also applies to attorneys-general.

[SunkenCiv]

• ...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said. [Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften [immigration, gay marriage] stance]

  ---

• One day after announcing on his radio show that he is "truly considering" running in 2014 for the U.S. Senate seat now held by New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg, Rivera amped up his message today in a television interview and a column on the Fox News Latino website... a moderate Republican who is fiscally conservative but also supports gay marriage and Roe v. Wade... [Geraldo Rivera declares himself a 'moderate Republican' as he eyes U.S. Senate run]

  ---

[Paladin2]

What about incinerating kids in a makeshift oven?

[cpdiii]

If they are a terrorist and an imminent threat Holder seemed to say that they could be killed. My question is how do you define an imminent threat and terrorist? Even then, is it legal and most importantly who gets to make the definition of who is and who is not an imminent threat?

The Venezuelan Constitution was modeled on that of the United States. Chavez ignored that Constitution due to the fact he had control of the Army and their loyalty. He packed the higher ranks with political cronies. He then changed the Constitution.

The same thing is slowly happening here. Be afraid.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Just unbelievable!!! Thank God for Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

[PghBaldy]

Watch my mouth? Are you serious?

[ctdonath2]

Moreso, how does “terrorist” have anything to do with “imminent threat”? The latter being sufficient regardless of the perpetrator’s motivation...