Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group doubles-down on ad challenging McConnell on his position against assault weapons ban
CN|2 Pure Politics ^ | 02/25/2013 | Ryan Alessi

Posted on 02/27/2013 11:34:28 AM PST by Republican Wildcat

A liberal group is again challenging U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell’s position on gun control in a commercial that began running Monday in Kentucky and Washington in advance of the Senate’s next hearing on guns.

The group Progressive Change Campaign Committee is spending $100,000 to run the ad for at least a week. It began airing Monday in Louisville, Lexington, Bowling Green and Paducah markets plus Washington, D.C., as the Senate’s Judiciary Committee prepares for a hearing Wednesday on the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013.”

It features Edmonson County resident Gary Nutt telling viewers that, as a hunter, he doesn’t see the point of owning semi-automatic assault weapons that can fire dozens of rounds quickly without needing a reload.

“I am a Vietnam Vet and a hunter. I only shot my rifle one time this last season. One shot, one deer,” he says in the ad. “But I’d be a pretty bad hunter if I needed an assault rifle to shoot that buck.”

Watch it here:

Nutt then criticizes McConnell — the Senate Republican leader — for opposing an assault weapons ban after taking $198,500 from the NRA and gun makers.

“Senator, whose side are you on?” Nutt asks to end the ad.

Nutt is among 20,000 gun owners who signed an online petition the Progressive Change Campaign Committee launched in support of President Barack Obama’s gun control proposal that includes an assault weapons ban and a limit on high-capacity magazines.

McConnell, though, has been consistently opposed to assault weapons ban even before receiving a campaign donation from the NRA.

(Excerpt) Read more at mycn2.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: banglist; electionussenate; guncontrol; mcconnell; secondamendment

1 posted on 02/27/2013 11:34:31 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Gary Nutt seems to be quite the Constitutional Scholar! :/


2 posted on 02/27/2013 11:42:29 AM PST by Cheeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
LoL! Running gun control ads in Kentucky! Why not just pile the ad money up and burn it, it will be just as useful?
3 posted on 02/27/2013 11:46:13 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

It’s a good thing the continued existence of our constitutional rights don’t rely on a nutt!


4 posted on 02/27/2013 11:48:24 AM PST by grobdriver (Vivere liberi aut mori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Waste your money, gun-control morons! 20,000 signed an on-line prtition? Big deal. Over 100,000 signed a petition to deport Piers Moron, and he’s still here.


5 posted on 02/27/2013 11:53:02 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar
"LoL! Running gun control ads in Kentucky! Why not just pile the ad money up and burn it, it will be just as useful?"

These are the people who own your body through 0bamaCare now.

What could possibly go wrong?

6 posted on 02/27/2013 11:56:51 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots

PRESS

to GIT-R-DONE!

Every Contribution Counts and Every Contribution is Truly and Greatly Appreciated!

LESS THAN 1,200. to GO!!


7 posted on 02/27/2013 12:02:13 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I don't own an assault weapon.
Those were tightly restricted by the National Firearms Act of 1934.

I don't hunt either but I do own a Tyranny Response Rifle.

MOLON LAVE

8 posted on 02/27/2013 12:08:40 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

You know, if conservatives were more committed, we’d have our own well-funded PACS with which to beat the Libs senseless all year long. Nah. That would require organization and commitment. Silly me.


9 posted on 02/27/2013 12:15:33 PM PST by pabianice (washington, dc ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
The group Progressive Change Campaign Committee is spending $100,000 to run the ad for at least a week

Hey Nutt! Who did you take YOUR money from to run this ad? Is it wrong to take money from people who support your cause or your constituents' stance on an issue?

Also, where is this ad going to be played? Probably on liberal-leaning stations.

Louisville - City in Jefferson County. One of only FOUR counties that went for Obama in 2012 (54.8-43.7)

Lexington - City in Fayette County. One of only FOUR counties that went for Obama in 2012 (49.3-48.3)

Not sure why Paducah or Bowling Green, other than they are also college towns, as these two counties went overwhelmingly for Romney.
10 posted on 02/27/2013 12:25:21 PM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

And they got some guy named NUTT to shill for them? I thought Republicans are the stupid party.


11 posted on 02/27/2013 1:03:45 PM PST by Impala64ssa (You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
You know, if conservatives were more committed, we’d have our own well-funded PACS with which to beat the Libs senseless all year long. Nah. That would require organization and commitment. Silly me.

PAC's are worthless. We need a broadcast network. The nightly broadcast news reaches an audience of 22m people. On a good day, Fox gets 6m.

12 posted on 02/27/2013 1:05:17 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Actually, the number of 6m for Fox I stated earlier was wrong. It’s actually 2m, compared to 22m for the broadcast networks. The difference is literally an order of magnitude.


13 posted on 02/27/2013 1:09:07 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Okay. You buy NBC and I’ll put up $10 to help pay you back.

Deal?


14 posted on 02/27/2013 1:40:03 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
Okay. You buy NBC and I’ll put up $10 to help pay you back. Deal?

I'd have bought NBC with my lunch money, but Comcast beat me to the punch. Better luck next time. Heck, it only cost $17b - I could have swung it by brown bagging a few peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

On a more serious note, though, it would be nice if Fox brought its format over to the broadcast channels it currently syndicates.

15 posted on 02/27/2013 2:38:01 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson