Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would New Gun Laws Spark Widespread Civil Disobedience?
PJ Media ^ | Feb 17, 2013 | Paul Hsieh

Posted on 02/17/2013 7:14:01 AM PST by EXCH54FE

his State of the Union address, President Obama doubled down on his gun-control proposals, again demanding that Congress ban so-called “assault weapons” and “high capacity magazines.” This is not a surprise. What has been a surprise are the increasingly open calls for defiance from gun owners, state legislatures, and local law enforcement. If the president’s proposals become law, he may move the country into turbulent waters we haven’t seen in many years.

Gun control has long been a controversial issue in American politics. However, there are three aspects to this issue that make this more volatile than other hot topics such as taxes, foreign policy, or abortion:

1) The strongest advocates of each side hold fundamentally irreconcilable positions.

On one hand, committed gun-control advocates say: “No one should be allowed to own certain weapons.” On the other hand, equally committed gun-rights advocates say: “No way in hell are we giving up these weapons.”

2) Ordinary Americans have declared their willingness to disobey the law.

New York state has already passed laws similar to Obama’s proposals. Gun owners there are now organizing a campaign of open civil disobedience, daring state officials to “come and take” their rifles. State officials already acknowledge that they will be unable to enforce the new law.

3) Local law enforcement officials and state governments have also vowed civil disobedience.

Over 280 sheriffs and eight state sheriffs’ associations have vowed to protect citizens’ Second Amendment rights against new gun laws.

The Utah Sheriffs’ Association used unusually strong language:

We, like you, swore a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and we are prepared to trade our lives for the preservation of its traditional interpretation.

Similarly, several state legislatures are considering laws to stop federal officials from enforcing new gun laws

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
In the worst case, we could see clashes between armed law enforcement officials at different levels of government, each regarding themselves duty-bound to enforce their respective understandings of the Constitution. Wide swaths of the country would likely thumb their noses at the central authorities — and get away with it.
1 posted on 02/17/2013 7:14:06 AM PST by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Yes. Emphatically.


2 posted on 02/17/2013 7:16:13 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
If the president’s proposals become law, he may move the country into turbulent waters we haven’t seen in many years.

Yeah, like 200+ years.

3 posted on 02/17/2013 7:18:04 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks like Right-Wing extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Indeed, widespread civil disobedience will be the test for survival of the nation.


4 posted on 02/17/2013 7:19:11 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

If the president doesn’t respect the law, people are beginning to ask themselves “why the hell should I?”

Both Obama and Holder have stated publicly that they will not enforce certain laws.

Sheeeese, we’re becoming a land of scofflaws.


5 posted on 02/17/2013 7:20:03 AM PST by jakota (jakota)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Anti-gun laws will be treated the same way Gov. Brown treated Prop. 8, or the way Obama treated DOMA. Brown/Bama set the standard for treating laws they don’t like.

Simply Ignore them.


6 posted on 02/17/2013 7:22:26 AM PST by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Just remember guys/girls Demorats/Rino’s running for reelection in 2014 we have to hold their feet to the fire if we hope to change things. I’m not giving up my AR for nobody.


7 posted on 02/17/2013 7:23:03 AM PST by Rappini (Veritas vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Well our local sheriff, here in Alabama, is a dimwit. I have known him since we were kids. He is an big hunger. Goes to Alaska and such places too hunt. But, I can guarantee you, if he could take all our guns, he would. We have had words over it and he ain’t happy with what people around here are telling him. He wants our guns, so he can kiss Obama’s butt (he has been to the WH and met with Obama recently with other sheriffs, etc.) and he wants to toe the party line. Mostly, he is a lying hypocrite who lies to cover his lies. I don’t vote for him. I hope this election, since the entire county government and most of Alabama’s government is republican, we can get rid of his lying behind.


8 posted on 02/17/2013 7:23:44 AM PST by RetiredArmy (1 Cor 15: 50-54 & 1 Thess 4: 13-17. That about covers it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

There is another factor in the issue that has emerged over the last 5 years.

Guns, especially quality guns or particular types of guns, are increasing in value, and are therefore an appreciating asset in the hands of their owners.

This creates an incentive on the part of the owner to hold onto his assets and protect them. It makes government one stink more odious than before, and inclines the people to be non-compliant.

All of this suggests that government no longer serves the people, and is no longer neutral toward the people.


9 posted on 02/17/2013 7:24:26 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

duh. Hunger is hunter. My bad.


10 posted on 02/17/2013 7:24:38 AM PST by RetiredArmy (1 Cor 15: 50-54 & 1 Thess 4: 13-17. That about covers it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
No sane person would want a conflict between Constitutionally Protected and God Given Rights Advocates and those from the other side. Our nation would be torn asunder. The anti-rights advocates are constantly seeking not only control of people to determine their fates but also seek to institute control over their children. As for me and my children, we shall praise the Lord and pass the ammunition should that point of no choice and that cup from which to drink be forced upon us.
11 posted on 02/17/2013 7:25:32 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakota
"Sheeeese, we’re becoming a land of scofflaws."

We have more laws than one individual can know.

We need a comprehensive, common sense reform of all laws and gov't regulations.

12 posted on 02/17/2013 7:26:46 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

>>Would New Gun Laws Spark Widespread Civil Disobedience

I seriously doubt it - for all the tough talk, 99.99% of the people when faced with the option of obeying the (illegal) laws, or having some sort of confrontation with a government hell-bent on taking away their rights, will rollover in 30 seconds or less and go back to the couch, eating Doritos, drinking their 2-Liter bottles of soda and watching mindless drivel on TV.

There will be some whack-job that will have a shoot-out with the cops, get killed and will immediately be labeled a poster-boy for the Tea-party or NRA by the complicit media.

We have become a nation of sheep, and there is no going back. The fight has been fought - we lost.


13 posted on 02/17/2013 7:31:39 AM PST by qwerty1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

“Well our local sheriff, here in Alabama, is a dimwit.”

I believe that a “country sheriff” is the highest level of “elected” law enforcements. In many ways, the county sheriffs are the most powerful, within their jurisdictions, of any law enforcement.

Seems that this leve either has the very best of officials or the very worst. Yours appears to be an example of the worst.

Hopefull, the good people of your country will peacefully depose this petty tyrant in the next election.


14 posted on 02/17/2013 7:31:42 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Resistance to a enemy of the constitution is not “disobedience”, it is civic duty.


15 posted on 02/17/2013 7:32:05 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qwerty1234

You just put the cart before the horse.


16 posted on 02/17/2013 7:34:04 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

Obama WANTS civil disobedience to his gun laws if passed...If it is intense enough, he will call for martial law and invite UN troops in...All this in order to bypass the 2016 election and stay in office and in control....


17 posted on 02/17/2013 7:35:54 AM PST by JW1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: qwerty1234

“We have become a nation of sheep, and there is no going back. The fight has been fought - we lost.”

I agree with your first statement that we have become sheep...I know that in regards to firearms, I know I am not willing to die to make a point. However, I disagree with you that the fight has been lost. When we can no longer vote, then the fight will have been totally lost. Until then we can throw the numbskulls out of office....and that doesn’t require killing or being killed.


18 posted on 02/17/2013 7:37:47 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Well, the nation survived 15 years of widespread civil disobedience while the 18th amendment was in effect, and it was finally ended legally. I’m hopeful that we will get through this too.


19 posted on 02/17/2013 7:44:45 AM PST by 19th LA Inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
What's new about these so called laws?

1 Disarm your enemy.

2 Enslave your enemy.

20 posted on 02/17/2013 7:45:30 AM PST by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson