Posted on 02/06/2013 9:26:04 AM PST by TigerClaws
Really odd. (Skip the Ad).
Explanations?
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Never trust a woman wearing Charlie Brown’s shirt.
It is on the internet, it must be true. After all, who can you trust if not crazy ladies with Charlie Brown’s t-shirt?
That tattoo on her arm in the LEFT-HAND photo IS Charlie Brown.. The shirt in RIGHT-HAND photo is a Charlie Brown shirt. NO DOUBT this is the same person.
Interesting, the connections of the two fathers to criminal case that are in progress. Very interesting.
It’s a local Fox news story. You saying that’s a fake reporter and fake news story?
The photos (tattoos) clearly match. Agree many of the other sites with the “look it’s the same person” are loopy. This IS the same person.
Why would they even suggest someone arrested for violating a restraining order could be put on the same cell block as an accused mass murderer?
It’s really odd.
INteresting, the two fathers (Holmes and Lanza) connected to criminal cases that are in progress. Very interesting, indeed!
If you are referring to the Libor thing, that was debunked almost immediately. There was no Libor case ongoing and neither father was involved in it.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/12/newtown-libor-hunger-games-theories.php
Unfortunately like so many things on the internet, once it becomes ‘common knowledge’ everyone assumes it is true, even when it isn’t.
Talking about LIBOR? Hasn’t that been debunked? Not sure what the poster is implying here.. That a correctional officer can’t be in jail? Isn’t that normal for a correctional officer since most of them are gutter scum collecting huge salaries? Poster is implying she’s a hack, put there to discredit Holmes as a continuance of a ‘false flag’ op. But I’m not surprised a Correctional Officer is in jail. That is why she doesn’t want her last name used. She’s protecting that and using ‘medical condition’ as an excuse not to say her last name is nonsensical.
Agreed.
It would be perfectly plausible for "legal reasons" though -- as [supposedly] the restraining-order violation may still need to be addressed by the court and such video could be called by prosecution a confession of guilt.
'Medical' just doesn't fit.
They are both in the medical wing. It’s apparently mixed population.
Does raise a few questions though...
1. Why would someone violating a civil restraining order be put on the cell block with an accused mass murderer? Common misdemeanor people are in there with Holmes?
2. She’s a corrections officer and could be in jail. Okay. Then why is she using a fake name? Why did the Sheriff verify she was in jail and with Holmes?
The point of the story seems to be making Holmes look like he’s getting benefits others aren’t and he’s sane. He’s not the ‘glassy eyed’ medicated guy we all saw at the televised hearing.
It’s... just odd.
Agree?
There was a Libor case. Not before Congress.
It involved GE. Three of their guys were convicted. People are using that to link to GE dad Lanza - but different branches.
As for the current story....here it is on a News Site
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/october012012/aurora-cp-2.php
“(Updated 7 April 2012)- Welcome to the most unique and interesting news group in the nation. Salem-News.com is also the first exclusively Web news organization in the world. Not a blog, but a full service multimedia news site staffed by award-winning professional journalists and a wealth of diverse writers from all over the world. In addition to having writers in scores of U.S. states, we are also based in Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Cambodia, Canada, Egypt, Germany, Great Britain, India, Iran, Ireland, Japan, Lebanon, Mexico, Denmark, Palestine, (West Bank and Gaza) Russian Federation, Spain, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Uganda and Vietnam.”
The ^only^ thing I find interesting about the UToob video is the local Fox Reporter saying, “The sheriff has confirmed she spent time in the prison this past weekend.” and the chyron stating that she was “a confirmed inmate”.
A does not verify B, in this case.
Yes I do agree. Perhaps Holmes is safer being housed with non-violent types? But having him mixed with anyone regardless of background isn’t appropriate. She could just be mistaken as to the person being James. Maybe it’s not even him. Salter’s name should have been said, though.. If to protect her as part of a false flag narrative, those tentacles reach far and wide then.
The prop guy for that movie is from Newtown. He was killed. His wife thinks he was murdered due to her entanglement with authorities.
In one instance, they spent $42,000 to deny her a bus stop for her children.
That stood out at me, too, when I watched the movie a couple of weeks ago. It was weird. I wouldn't have even noticed. That being said, there are many "Sandy Hooks" in the United States:
Sandy Hook, Connecticut, a village in the town of Newtown, Connecticut
Sandy Hook, Kentucky, a city in Elliott County
Sandy Hook, Maryland, an unincorporated community in Washington County
Sandy Hook, Mississippi
Sandy Hook, Virginia, an unincorporated community in Goochland County
Sandy Hook, Wisconsin, a Census Designated Place in Grant County.
Sandy Hook, Missouri, on the National Register of Historic Places listings in Missouri, Counties L–N
Thought that was photoshop.
So she’s not an inmate? She presented herself as being one.
Why?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.