Posted on 11/25/2012 10:21:41 PM PST by Libloather
The national, or the socialist?
The Democrats' Fallback Plan For When Obamacare Inevitably Fails
Congressional Democrats unmistakably anticipate the failure of ObamaCare, given they had already asked the CBO to price a formal public option for 2014. The proposals co-sponsor Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), now reelected to a sixth term, said By reintroducing it, we make sure that people dont forget this is a viable option . as the health bill is implemented, more and more people are going to come to the realization that cost containment and competition arent as robust as they should be, because of the absence of the public option. Later, John Conyers (D-Mich.) in 2011 re-introduced his nationalized single payer system called Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act in his H.R. 676 bill to the House of Representatives, following President Obamas State of the Union in which the president said that the ACA was open to change if you have ideas about how to improve this law. Conyers was quite direct when he unabashedly stated the Democrats end-game along with their standard canard: Improved and Expanded Medicare for All is inevitable in America it is just a matter of when it will happen. Single-payer health care systems have successfully contained health care costs and provided high quality health care in countries in Europe, Taiwan, Japan, and Canada. And lets not overlook proposed legislation aiming for total take-over of health care by Democrat-dominated state governments, such as in Vermont and Delaware.
Second, or perhaps in advance of single payer legislation, watch for the federal government to restrict doctors from practicing, or possibly even criminalize them, unless they accept all patients with insurance paying government-defined rates for medical tests and treatments.
No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendment), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.
http://www.coachisright.com/the-law-itself-says-virtually-no-one-has-to-participate-in-obamacare/
Does this work? Its from the Obamacare law itself.
Well, you know what that means......
Leni
The Republican Party redrew Allen West's District to include an area where thry were fairly sure he would be defeated and to add insult to injury, the State Republicans remained silent as a mouse in church and were as useless as a one leg man at an ass kicking contest while the Democrats stole the election from under his [Allen's]nose. Had the situation been reversed and the Democrat candidate, with a Democrat Governor, Atty.General, Secretary of State, the howls of protest would have resounded through out the universe.
His only goal is to "overwhelm the system."
GA, TX, Ala for sure.
I dont mind so much everyone having to have some level of coverage .... I also have a real problem with pre-existing conditions being covered. Probably partially because its something I dont have to worry about,
- - - - - - -
Well I have a problem with both. ALL of my conditions are pre-existing, so I will be force to pay for health insurance that I can’t use.
Secondly, I have a RELIGIOUS OBJECTION to insurance and ALL Western Medical care, but they don’t care about that.
Wasn't she the one on Romney's "healthcare team", who said he wanted RomneyCare nationwide?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.